UNIT 5: CONTROL SYSTEMS - EXAM-FOCUSED SHORT NOTES
1. System Modeling & Representation
Signal Flow Graphs & Mason's Gain Formula
-
Definition: A graphical representation of a system using nodes (variables) and branches (transfer functions).
-
Forward Path: Path from input node to output node, touching each node only once.
-
Loop: Path that starts and ends at the same node, without repeating any node.
-
Non-touching Loops: Loops with no common nodes.
-
-
Mason's Gain Formula:
$$T = \frac{C(s)}{R(s)} = \sum_{k=1}^{N} \frac{P_k \Delta_k}{\Delta}$$
Where:
* $$\displaystyle P_k $$ = Gain of the $$\displaystyle k^{th} $$ forward path.
* $\Delta$ = $1 -$ (sum of all individual loop gains) $+$ (sum of gain products of all possible two non-touching loops) $-$ ...
* $$\displaystyle \Delta_k $$ = Value of $\Delta$ for the part of the graph **not touching** the $$\displaystyle k^{th} $$ forward path.
-
Step-by-Step Procedure:
-
Identify all forward paths ($$\displaystyle P_k $$) and loops.
-
Calculate $\Delta$.
-
For each forward path, determine $$\displaystyle \Delta_k $$ by removing all loops touching that path and computing $\Delta$ for the remaining graph.
-
Apply the formula.
-
-
Advantages over Block Diagram:
-
Easier to apply for complex, interconnected systems.
-
Systematic, rule-based; less prone to error than successive reductions.
-
Easily identifies all forward paths and loops.
-
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Questions often involve systems with multiple forward paths and several touching/non-touching loops. Carefully list all loops and their combinations.
Electrical Analogies of Mechanical Systems
Two main analogies to convert mechanical systems (translational/rotational) into equivalent electrical networks.
| Mechanical Quantity | Force-Voltage (F-V) Analogy<br>(Direct) | Force-Current (F-I) Analogy<br>(Inverse) |
|---|---|---|
| Force (F) | Voltage (V) | Current (I) |
| Velocity (v) | Current (I) | Voltage (V) |
| Displacement (x) | Flux (ψ) | Charge (q) |
| Mass (M) | Inductance (L) | Capacitance (C) |
| Friction (B) | Resistance (R) | Conductance (1/R) |
| Spring (K) | Inverse Capacitance (1/C) | Inductance (L) |
| Compliance (1/K) | Capacitance (C) | Inverse Inductance (1/L) |
-
Derivation Principle: Based on mathematical similarity between governing differential equations.
-
Translational: $$\displaystyle M\ddot{x} + B\dot{x} + Kx = F $$
-
Rotational: $$\displaystyle J\ddot{\theta} + B\dot{\theta} + K\theta = T $$
-
[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Confusing which analogy maps mass to L vs. C. Remember: F-V is like a series RLC circuit (mass ~ inductor). F-I is like a parallel RLC circuit (mass ~ capacitor).
2. Time Domain Analysis & Standard Test Signals
Standard Test Input Signals
| Signal | Mathematical Form | Physical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Step | $$\displaystyle u(t) = 1 $$ for $t \ge 0$ | Sudden change/command (e.g., switch ON). |
| Ramp | $$\displaystyle r(t) = t \cdot u(t) $$ | Constantly increasing demand (e.g., linearly rising position). |
| Parabolic | $$\displaystyle p(t) = \frac{t^2}{2} \cdot u(t) $$ | Constant acceleration input. |
| Impulse | $\delta(t)$ | Very large force/short duration (initial "kick"). |
First Order System
-
Transfer Function: $$\displaystyle G(s) = \frac{K}{\tau s + 1} $$, where $\tau$ = time constant.
-
Unit Step Response: $$\displaystyle c(t) = K(1 - e^{-t/\tau}) $$.
- At $$\displaystyle t = \tau $$, response reaches 63.2% of final value.
-
Steady-State Error (ess):
-
Step input: $$\displaystyle e_{ss} = \frac{1}{1+K} $$ (for unit step).
-
Ramp input: $$\displaystyle e_{ss} = \tau $$ (non-zero, infinite velocity error constant).
-
Second Order System (Underdamped, $$\displaystyle \zeta < 1 $$)
- Standard Form:
$$G(s) = \frac{\omega_n^2}{s^2 + 2\zeta\omega_n s + \omega_n^2}$$
Where $$\displaystyle \omega_n $$ = natural frequency, $\zeta$ = damping ratio.
- Unit Step Response Expression:
$$c(t) = 1 - \frac{e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}} \sin(\omega_d t + \phi)$$
where $$\displaystyle \omega_d = \omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^2} $$ (damped frequency), $$\displaystyle \phi = \cos^{-1}(\zeta) $$.
-
Key Performance Specifications (Derivations Crucial):
- Maximum Overshoot ($$\displaystyle M_p $$):
$$M_p = e^{\frac{-\zeta\pi}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}}$$
> Graph of $$\displaystyle M_p $$ vs. $\zeta$ is exponential decay. $$\displaystyle M_p = 0\% $$ for $\zeta \ge 1$.
\boxed{M_p = e^{\frac{-\zeta\pi}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}}}
* **Peak Time ($$\displaystyle t_p $$):**
$$t_p = \frac{\pi}{\omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}} = \frac{\pi}{\omega_d}$$
\boxed{t_p = \frac{\pi}{\omega_d}}
* **Rise Time ($$\displaystyle t_r $$):** Time to go from 10% to 90% (or 0% to 100%) of final value.
For underdamped: $$\displaystyle t_r \approx \frac{\pi - \phi}{\omega_d} $$.
* **Settling Time ($$\displaystyle t_s $$):** Time to stay within a band (usually ±2% or ±5%).
$$t_s \approx \frac{4}{\zeta\omega_n} \quad (\text{2\% band}) \quad \text{or} \quad \frac{3}{\zeta\omega_n} \quad (\text{5\% band})$$
\boxed{t_s \approx \frac{4}{\zeta\omega_n}}
- Resonant Frequency ($$\displaystyle \omega_r $$) & Peak ($$\displaystyle M_r $$):
$$\omega_r = \omega_n\sqrt{1-2\zeta^2} \quad (\text{for } \zeta < \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})$$
$$M_r = \frac{1}{2\zeta\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}$$
> Exists only for $$\displaystyle \zeta < 0.707 $$.
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Deriving $$\displaystyle M_p $$ and $$\displaystyle t_p $$ from the step response expression is a repeatedly asked 7-mark question. Practice the steps: find $$\displaystyle dc(t)/dt=0 $$, solve for $$\displaystyle t_p $$, substitute back for $$\displaystyle c(t_p) $$.
3. Steady-State Error Analysis
Static Error Coefficients
For open-loop TF $$\displaystyle G(s)H(s) = \frac{K \prod (s+z_i)}{s^N \prod (s+p_i)} $$ (N = system type).
| Coefficient | Formula | Measures error for... |
|---|---|---|
| Position ($$\displaystyle K_p $$) | $$\displaystyle \lim_{s \to 0} G(s)H(s) $$ | Step input |
| Velocity ($$\displaystyle K_v $$) | $$\displaystyle \lim_{s \to 0} s G(s)H(s) $$ | Ramp input |
| Acceleration ($$\displaystyle K_a $$) | $$\displaystyle \lim_{s \to 0} s^2 G(s)H(s) $$ | Parabolic input |
Steady-State Error ($$\displaystyle e_{ss} $$) for Standard Inputs
| Input \ System Type | Type 0 | Type 1 | Type 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step (A) | $$\displaystyle \frac{A}{1+K_p} $$ | 0 | 0 |
| Ramp (At) | $\infty$ | $$\displaystyle \frac{A}{K_v} $$ | 0 |
| Parabolic ($$\displaystyle At^2/2 $$) | $\infty$ | $\infty$ | $$\displaystyle \frac{A}{K_a} $$ |
Generalized Error Coefficients
For input $$\displaystyle r(t) = \frac{a_0 t^n}{n!} + ... + a_0 $$ (polynomial):
$$e_{ss} = \frac{a_0}{E_n(0)} \quad \text{where} \quad E(s) = 1 + G(s)H(s)$$
$$\displaystyle E_n(0) $$ is the $$\displaystyle n^{th} $$ derivative of $E(s)$ evaluated at $$\displaystyle s=0 $$.
Limitations of Static Error Coefficients
-
Only applicable for stable open-loop systems (or systems with poles in LHP).
-
Only valid for polynomial inputs (step, ramp, parabolic).
-
Does not provide transient response information (overshoot, settling time).
-
Fails for unstable open-loop systems (ess may be finite even if CL unstable).
[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Forgetting that $$\displaystyle K_p, K_v, K_a $$ are defined for the open-loop transfer function $G(s)H(s)$. Also, note that Type 0 system has finite ess for step, infinite for ramp/parabolic.
4. Stability Analysis in Time Domain
Routh-Hurwitz Stability Criterion
-
Concept: Determines number of closed-loop poles in Right-Half Plane (RHP) without solving characteristic equation.
-
Condition for Stability: All elements of the first column of Routh array must be positive (for stable polynomial with positive coefficients).
-
Formation of Routh Array:
For $$\displaystyle a_n s^n + a_{n-1} s^{n-1} + ... + a_0 = 0 $$.
| $$\displaystyle s^n $$ | $$\displaystyle a_n $$ | $$\displaystyle a_{n-2} $$ | $$\displaystyle a_{n-4} $$ | ... | | $$\displaystyle s^{n-1} $$ | $$\displaystyle a_{n-1} $$ | $$\displaystyle a_{n-3} $$ | $$\displaystyle a_{n-5} $$ | ... | | $$\displaystyle s^{n-2} $$ | $$\displaystyle b_1 = \frac{a_{n-1}a_{n-2} - a_n a_{n-3}}{a_{n-1}} $$ | $$\displaystyle b_2 $$ | ... | | | $$\displaystyle s^{n-3} $$ | $$\displaystyle c_1 = \frac{b_1 a_{n-3} - a_{n-1} b_2}{b_1} $$ | ... | | | | ... | ... | ... | | |
-
Special Cases:
-
First element zero: Replace with a small positive $\epsilon$ and continue. Sign change indicates instability.
-
Entire row zero: Indicates symmetrical roots about origin (purely imaginary or RHP-LHP pairs). Form auxiliary equation from the row above, differentiate, and replace the zero row with coefficients of the derivative.
-
Sign changes in first column: Number of sign changes = number of RHP poles.
-
Finding Range of K for Stability & Oscillation Frequency
-
Apply Routh to characteristic equation $$\displaystyle 1 + G(s)H(s) = 0 $$ (contains parameter K).
-
Condition: All first column elements > 0 → gives inequalities in K.
-
Marginal stability (oscillations): Occurs when a row becomes zero. The frequency of sustained oscillations $\omega$ is found by solving the auxiliary equation $$\displaystyle A(s) = 0 $$ for $$\displaystyle s = j\omega $$.
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Questions like "find relation between K and T for stability" or "find marginal K and frequency of oscillations" are very common. Master the entire row zero case and auxiliary equation method.
5. Root Locus Technique
Definition & Basic Rules
-
Root Locus: Plot of closed-loop pole locations as gain $K$ varies from $0$ to $\infty$ for the system $$\displaystyle T(s) = \frac{K G(s)}{1 + K G(s)} $$.
-
Construction Rules Summary:
-
Branches: Equal to number of open-loop poles (or zeros, whichever is greater).
-
Start/End Points: Start at OL poles ($$\displaystyle K=0 $$), end at OL zeros ($K \to \infty$). If zeros < poles, $p-z$ branches go to $\infty$ along asymptotes.
-
Real Axis Segments: Exists where number of real poles+zeros to the right is odd.
-
Asymptotes: For branches going to $\infty$.
-
Centroid: $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = \frac{\sum \text{Re}(p_i) - \sum \text{Re}(z_i)}{p - z} $$
-
Angles: $$\displaystyle \theta_a = \frac{(2k+1)180^\circ}{p-z}, \quad k = 0, \pm1, \pm2... $$
-
-
Breakaway/Break-in Points: On real axis segments. Solve $$\displaystyle \frac{dK}{ds} = 0 $$ where $$\displaystyle K = -\frac{1}{G(s)H(s)} $$.
-
Angle of Departure/Arrival: For complex poles/zeros.
- Departure from pole $$\displaystyle p_i $$: $$\displaystyle \angle \text{Departure} = 180^\circ - \sum \text{angles to other poles} + \sum \text{angles to zeros} $$.
-
Intersection with Imaginary Axis: Use Routh-Hurwitz on characteristic equation or angle condition ($$\displaystyle \angle G(j\omega)H(j\omega) = \pm180^\circ $$).
-
Sketching Complete Root Locus (Example: $$\displaystyle G(s)H(s) = \frac{K}{s(s+2)(s^2+6s+25)} $$)
-
OL poles: $0, -2, -3\pm j4$. No OL zeros. 4 branches.
-
Real axis: Segment between $0$ and $-2$.
-
Asymptotes: $$\displaystyle p-z=4 $$, centroid at $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = \frac{(0-2-3-3) - 0}{4} = -2 $$. Angles: $$\displaystyle 45^\circ, 135^\circ, -45^\circ, -135^\circ $$.
-
Breakaway point on real axis between 0 and -2 (solve $$\displaystyle dK/ds=0 $$).
-
Departure angles from complex poles $-3\pm j4$.
-
Imaginary axis crossing: Use Routh on $$\displaystyle s^4 + 11s^3 + 43s^2 + 50s + K = 0 $$. Find $K$ for marginal stability.
Design Applications
-
Finding K for specified $\zeta$: Draw a line from origin at angle $$\displaystyle \theta = \cos^{-1}(\zeta) $$. Intersection with RL gives desired pole location and corresponding K.
-
PD Controller: Adds a zero at $$\displaystyle s = -1/T_d $$. RL attracts branches to the left, improving damping. Can achieve critical damping by placing zero appropriately.
-
Effect of Adding Poles/Zeros:
-
Adding OL zero: Attracts RL branches, generally improves stability and transient response.
-
Adding OL pole: Repels RL branches, tends to destabilize, slows response.
-
[!TIP] Exam Focus: "Sketch complete root locus with approximate breakaway points" and "Comment on stability" are extremely frequent. Always state the range of K for stability based on your sketch.
6. Frequency Domain Analysis (Bode, Nyquist, Polar)
Bode Plot Construction
-
Procedure:
-
Write $G(j\omega)H(j\omega)$ in standard form: $$\displaystyle K \cdot \frac{\prod (1+j\omega/z_i)}{\prod (1+j\omega/p_i)} $$.
-
Identify corner frequencies ($$\displaystyle \omega = |p_i|, |z_i| $$).
-
Magnitude Plot: Start at $$\displaystyle 20\log_{10}|K| $$ (dB). Apply ±20 dB/dec slope change at each pole/zero.
-
Phase Plot: Start at $$\displaystyle 0^\circ $$ (if no poles/zeros at origin) or $$\displaystyle -90^\circ \times N $$. Add $$\displaystyle -45^\circ $$ to $$\displaystyle -90^\circ $$ transition around each pole/zero.
-
-
Type 0,1,2 Systems:
-
Type 0: Low-freq mag slope = 0 dB/dec. Phase starts near $$\displaystyle 0^\circ $$.
-
Type 1: Low-freq mag slope = -20 dB/dec. Phase starts near $$\displaystyle -90^\circ $$.
-
Type 2: Low-freq mag slope = -40 dB/dec. Phase starts near $$\displaystyle -180^\circ $$.
-
-
Key Frequencies:
-
Gain Crossover ($$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$): Where $$\displaystyle |G(j\omega)H(j\omega)| = 1 $$ (0 dB). $$\displaystyle PM = 180^\circ + \angle G(j\omega_{gc})H(j\omega_{gc}) $$.
-
Phase Crossover ($$\displaystyle \omega_{pc} $$): Where $$\displaystyle \angle G(j\omega)H(j\omega) = -180^\circ $$. $$\displaystyle GM = -20\log_{10}|G(j\omega_{pc})H(j\omega_{pc})| $$ (in dB).
-
-
Stability Criteria (Unity Feedback):
-
Stable: $$\displaystyle PM > 0^\circ $$ (and $$\displaystyle GM > 0 $$ dB).
-
Marginally Stable: $$\displaystyle PM = 0^\circ $$ (or $$\displaystyle GM = 0 $$ dB).
-
Desirable: $$\displaystyle PM \approx 30^\circ - 60^\circ $$ for good transient response.
-
[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Phase at $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$ must be calculated accurately. Remember phase contribution from a factor $$\displaystyle (1+j\omega/\omega_c) $$ is $$\displaystyle \tan^{-1}(\omega/\omega_c) $$. For $$\displaystyle \omega \ll \omega_c $$, phase ≈ $$\displaystyle 0^\circ $$; for $$\displaystyle \omega \gg \omega_c $$, phase ≈ $$\displaystyle 90^\circ $$.
Polar Plot (Nyquist without encirclements)
-
Definition: Plot of $|G(j\omega)H(j\omega)| \angle G(j\omega)H(j\omega)$ as $\omega$ varies from $0$ to $\infty$.
-
Construction for Type 0,1,2:
-
Type 0: Starts at $$\displaystyle K \angle 0^\circ $$, ends at $$\displaystyle 0 \angle -90^\circ \times (\text{# poles}) $$.
-
Type 1: Starts at $$\displaystyle \infty \angle -90^\circ $$, ends at $$\displaystyle 0 \angle -90^\circ \times (\text{# poles} - 1) $$.
-
Type 2: Starts at $$\displaystyle \infty \angle -180^\circ $$, ends at $$\displaystyle 0 \angle -90^\circ \times (\text{# poles} - 2) $$.
-
-
Effect of Adding Poles:
-
Pole at origin: Plot starts at $\infty$ with angle $$\displaystyle -90^\circ \times N $$.
-
Pole at $$\displaystyle s = -1/T_i $$: Introduces a "dip" or loop, shifting the plot.
-
Nyquist Stability Criterion
-
Contour Mapping: Map the Nyquist contour (encircling RHP) through $G(s)H(s)$.
-
Nyquist Equation: $$\displaystyle N = P - Z $$
-
$N$ = Net clockwise encirclements of -1 point by Nyquist plot.
-
$P$ = Number of open-loop RHP poles (poles of $G(s)H(s)$).
-
$Z$ = Number of closed-loop RHP poles (poles of $1+G(s)H(s)$).
-
-
Stability Condition: For closed-loop stability, $$\displaystyle Z = 0 $$. Therefore, $$\displaystyle N = P $$.
-
Procedure:
-
Plot Nyquist for $$\displaystyle \omega: 0^+ \to \infty $$ and $$\displaystyle \omega: \infty \to 0^+ $$ (mirror image if real).
-
Count $P$ from open-loop TF.
-
Count $N$ (encirclements of -1).
-
Apply $$\displaystyle Z = P - N $$. If $$\displaystyle Z=0 $$, system stable.
-
-
Gain Margin from Nyquist: The factor by which gain can be multiplied before plot passes through -1. If Nyquist crosses real axis at $$\displaystyle x < 0 $$, $$\displaystyle GM = 1/|x| $$.
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Sketching Nyquist for $$\displaystyle G(s)H(s) = \frac{K}{s(s+2)(s+10)} $$ and finding K for stability is a classic question. Remember: $$\displaystyle P=1 $$ (pole at origin). For stability, Nyquist must encircle -1 point once clockwise ($$\displaystyle N=-1 $$) so that $$\displaystyle Z = 1 - (-1) = 0 $$.
7. Compensation Techniques
| Feature | Lead Compensation | Lag Compensation | Lag-Lead Compensation |
|---|---|---|---|
| TF | $$\displaystyle \frac{1+ T_d s}{1 + \alpha T_d s}, \alpha < 1 $$ | $$\displaystyle \frac{1+ T_i s}{1 + \beta T_i s}, \beta > 1 $$ | Product of lead & lag networks |
| Zero/Pole | Zero at $$\displaystyle 1/T_d $$, pole at $$\displaystyle 1/(\alpha T_d) $$ (pole left of zero) | Pole at $$\displaystyle 1/(\beta T_i) $$, zero at $$\displaystyle 1/T_i $$ (zero left of pole) | Two zeros, two poles |
| Bode Effect | Increases PM, shifts $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$ right | Increases low-freq gain ($$\displaystyle K_v, K_a $$), small PM change | Improves both PM and low-freq gain |
| Root Locus Effect | Adds zero, attracts branches left | Adds pole, slightly repels branches | Combines both effects |
| Design Goal | Improve transient response (speed, stability) | Improve steady-state accuracy | Meet both specs simultaneously |
| Network | RC circuit (high-pass filter) | RC circuit (low-pass filter) | Cascaded or single network |
Lead Compensator Design (Frequency Domain)
Given $$\displaystyle K_v $$ and $$\displaystyle PM_{spec} $$:
-
Determine required velocity constant: $$\displaystyle K_v = \lim_{s\to0} s G_c(s)G(s) \ge \text{spec} $$.
-
Find uncompensated $$\displaystyle PM_{un} $$ from Bode of $G(s)$.
-
Phase boost needed: $$\displaystyle \phi_m = PM_{spec} - PM_{un} + 5^\circ $$ (safety).
-
Calculate $$\displaystyle \alpha = \frac{1 - \sin\phi_m}{1 + \sin\phi_m} $$.
-
Find $$\displaystyle \omega_{max} $$ (frequency where $|G(j\omega)|$ has magnitude $$\displaystyle 20\log_{10}(1/\sqrt{\alpha}) $$). This is new $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$.
-
$$\displaystyle T = 1/(\omega_{max} \sqrt{\alpha}) $$.
-
$K$ adjusted to satisfy $$\displaystyle K_v $$ requirement.
Lag Compensator Design
-
Determine required $$\displaystyle K_v $$ or $$\displaystyle K_a $$.
-
Find $K$ from uncompensated system to meet $$\displaystyle K_v $$ spec: $$\displaystyle K_{new} = \beta K_{old} $$.
-
Choose $\beta$ such that $$\displaystyle \beta = K_{new}/K_{old} $$.
-
Place lag zero at $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$ of uncompensated system (or 1/10th of new $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$) to minimize phase effect.
-
$$\displaystyle T_i = 10/\omega_{gc} $$ (pole 10x left of zero).
[!TIP] Design Tip: For lead, $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$ shifts right (faster response). For lag, $$\displaystyle \omega_{gc} $$ shifts left (slightly slower). Lag-lead balances this.
8. State Space Analysis (Modern Control)
State Model
-
State Variables: Minimum set of variables $$\displaystyle (x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) $$ that completely describe system dynamics.
-
State Equations:
$$\dot{x} = Ax + Bu$$
$$y = Cx + Du$$
Where $x$ = state vector, $u$ = input, $y$ = output.
- Choice of State Variables: Often chosen as capacitor voltages and inductor currents (electrical) or positions and velocities (mechanical).
State Transition Matrix $$\displaystyle \phi(t) = e^{At} $$
-
Definition: Matrix function that maps initial state to future state: $$\displaystyle x(t) = \phi(t)x(0) $$ (for $$\displaystyle u=0 $$).
-
Properties:
-
$$\displaystyle \phi(0) = I $$ (identity).
-
$$\displaystyle \phi(t_2)\phi(t_1) = \phi(t_1 + t_2) $$.
-
$$\displaystyle \phi^{-1}(t) = \phi(-t) $$.
-
$$\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}\phi(t) = A\phi(t) = \phi(t)A $$.
-
$$\displaystyle \phi(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1}\left[(sI - A)^{-1}\right] $$.
-
-
Solution of State Equations:
$$x(t) = \phi(t)x(0) + \int_0^t \phi(t-\tau) Bu(\tau) d\tau$$
Eigenvalues & Eigenvectors
-
Eigenvalues ($$\displaystyle \lambda_i $$): Roots of $$\displaystyle \det(sI - A) = 0 $$. They are the system poles. Determine stability, natural response modes.
-
Eigenvectors ($$\displaystyle v_i $$): Solve $$\displaystyle (A - \lambda_i I)v_i = 0 $$. Define modal directions.
-
Diagonalization: If $A$ has distinct eigenvalues, $$\displaystyle A = V \Lambda V^{-1} $$, where $$\displaystyle V = [v_1, v_2, ...] $$ (modal matrix), $$\displaystyle \Lambda = \text{diag}(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, ...) $$.
Then $$\displaystyle e^{At} = V e^{\Lambda t} V^{-1} $$.
-
For Repeated Eigenvalues: Use Jordan form.
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Computing eigenvalues/eigenvectors for a 2x2 or 3x3 matrix $A$ is common. For $$\displaystyle A = \begin{bmatrix}0 & 1\\-2 & -3\end{bmatrix} $$: $$\displaystyle \det(sI-A)=s^2+3s+2=0 \Rightarrow \lambda_1=-1, \lambda_2=-2 $$. Eigenvectors: for $$\displaystyle \lambda=-1 $$, $$\displaystyle v_1 = [1, -1]^T $$; for $$\displaystyle \lambda=-2 $$, $$\displaystyle v_2 = [1, -2]^T $$.
9. Actuators & Components
AC Servomotor
-
Construction: Two-phase induction motor. Stator has two windings (reference & control) 90° apart. Rotor is squirrel-cage.
-
Assumptions for TF Derivation:
-
Constant field flux (control voltage controls torque directly).
-
Linear torque-speed relationship.
-
Negligible rotor time constant ($$\displaystyle T_r \approx 0 $$).
-
No slip.
-
-
Transfer Function:
$$\frac{\theta(s)}{V_c(s)} = \frac{K}{s(T_M s + 1)}$$
Where $K$ = motor constant, $$\displaystyle T_M $$ = mechanical time constant ($J/B$).
Stepper Motor
-
Working: Digital motor. Rotor moves in discrete steps (e.g., 1.8°/step) when stator windings are energized in sequence.
-
Advantages: Open-loop position control, no feedback needed, precise positioning, holds position at rest.
-
Disadvantages: Resonance at high speeds, torque drops rapidly with speed, needs driver circuit.
Tacho-Generator
- Principle: Generates voltage $$\displaystyle V_t \propto \omega $$ (shaft speed). Used as a speed feedback sensor in control systems (e.g., in speed control loops).
10. Miscellaneous & Fundamental Concepts
Feedback in Control Systems
-
Significance:
-
Error Reduction: Reduces sensitivity to parameter variations and disturbances.
-
Stability Trade-off: Can destabilize a stable open-loop system if gain is too high.
-
Improves Bandwidth & Response: Can speed up or slow down response.
-
Reduces Steady-State Error: Increases system type.
-
Open Loop vs. Closed Loop
| Feature | Open Loop | Closed Loop |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback | No | Yes |
| Accuracy | Low (depends on calibration) | High (error corrected) |
| Robustness | Poor (sensitive to disturbances/params) | Good |
| Complexity | Simple | Complex (sensor, comparator) |
| Stability | Always stable | Needs design for stability |
| Example | Washing machine timer | Air conditioner thermostat |
Poles & Zeros
-
Poles: Roots of denominator of $G(s)$. Determine natural response (stability, speed).
-
LHP pole: decaying mode.
-
RHP pole: unstable, growing mode.
-
Imag axis pole: marginally stable (oscillation).
-
-
Zeros: Roots of numerator. Affect transient response shape (undershoot, direction) and controllability/observability.
Transfer Function Derivation
-
General Steps:
-
Write differential equations for the system (using Kirchhoff's laws, Newton's laws).
-
Take Laplace transform (assume zero ICs).
-
Express output/input ratio to get $$\displaystyle G(s) = C(s)/R(s) $$.
-
-
Example (Mechanical): $$\displaystyle M\ddot{x} + B\dot{x} + Kx = F \Rightarrow G(s) = X(s)/F(s) = \frac{1}{Ms^2 + Bs + K} $$.
[!TIP] Final Reminder: In exams, always sketch diagrams (root locus, Bode, Nyquist) clearly. Label axes, critical points (breakaway, crossover frequencies, margins). For derivations, state assumptions clearly. For design problems, verify final specs (e.g., check $$\displaystyle M_p $$ from obtained $\zeta$).