Robotics (IT-802 (C)) - Important Questions
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
Explain the working principles of P, PD and PID controllers used for position control of a robotic joint. Write the time-domain expression of a PID controller and discuss qualitatively how $K_p$, $K_i$ and $K_d$ affect steady-state error, rise time, overshoot and stability.
Core conceptual comparison and basic formula derivation for controller types used in position control of robotic joints.
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
Derive the closed-loop transfer function for a unity feedback system with plant $G(s)$ and a PID controller $C(s)=K_p+\frac{K_i}{s}+K_d s$. Show the characteristic equation and explain how each term $K_p$, $K_i$, $K_d$ modifies the poles of the closed-loop system.
Standard closed-loop derivation involving PID in Laplace domain; tests understanding of characteristic equation and parameter effects.
-
Unit 414 Marks Low Priority
Explain the Ziegler–Nichols tuning procedure based on the ultimate gain $K_u$ and ultimate period $T_u$. Using the plant $G(s)=\frac{1}{s\left\(s+2\right\)}$, outline the steps to obtain $K_u$ and $T_u$ and compute the PID parameters $K_p$, $K_i$ and $K_d$ as per the Ziegler–Nichols rules. State any assumptions you make.
Practical tuning method question combining analysis and application on a simple plant model (core applied skill for Unit 4 controllers).
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
For the robot manipulator dynamics $M(q)\ddot q + C(q,\dot q)\dot q + G(q)=\tau$, derive the computed-torque (feedback linearization) control law that yields a linear error dynamics. Show the control law in the form $\tau=M(q) v + C(q,\dot q)\dot q + G(q)$ and specify a typical choice of $v$ using PD terms for tracking. Briefly compare this approach with sliding mode control for robustness to model uncertainties.
Nonlinear control of robot dynamics: computed-torque / feedback linearization and sliding mode are canonical topics in advanced controls for manipulators.
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
Compare electric, hydraulic and pneumatic actuators for robotic joints. For each type discuss: typical power density, controllability, compliance, maintenance issues and typical application scenarios in robotics.
Fundamental comparative question on actuator technologies frequently asked in actuator selection sections of Unit 4.
-
Unit 410 Marks Low Priority
A rotary robot joint carries a payload of mass $m$ at a distance $l$ from the joint axis and the link has moment of inertia $I_{link}$ about the joint. Derive expressions for the required actuator torque $\tau$ to achieve a desired angular acceleration $\alpha$ at joint angle $\theta$, considering gravitational torque. Use $I_{a}=m l^{2}+I_{link}$ to denote the reflected inertia. Include the expression for the continuous power required if the joint rotates at angular speed $\omega$. Show all formulas explicitly.
Sizing and selection question that connects dynamics to actuator torque and power requirements (core calculation skill).
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
Explain the working principles and typical uses of the following transmission mechanisms in robotic manipulators: spur gear trains, planetary gears, timing belts and harmonic drives. Derive the basic relation between speed and gear teeth for a simple two-gear pair and write the relation expressing torque multiplication considering an ideal (lossless) gear pair.
Core theory question on transmission elements and fundamental kinematic relations for speed and torque conversion.
-
Unit 47 Marks Low Priority
A two-gear reduction has driving gear with $N_1=20$ teeth and driven gear with $N_2=60$ teeth. The motor shaft provides $\tau_{in}=0.5\ \mathrm{Nm}$ at $\omega_{in}=3000\ \mathrm{rpm}$ and the gearbox efficiency is 95%. Compute: (a) gear ratio, (b) output speed $\omega_{out}$ in rpm, and (c) output torque $\tau_{out}$ accounting for efficiency. Show calculations and formulas used.
Short numerical exercise applying gear ratio and efficiency — typical 7-mark computational question.
-
Unit 410 Marks Low Priority
Discuss the effects of backlash, compliance and transmission stiffness on position control accuracy and stability of robotic manipulators. Describe engineering measures to minimise their impact (for example: preloading, direct-drive, harmonic drives, torsional springs, control compensation) and explain how these choices trade off with cost and complexity.
Conceptual and design-level question on transmission imperfections and remedies highly relevant for robot accuracy and control.
Quick Add to Notes
Save questions, your own notes and screenshots into notes filed by unit. It takes a free account.
Create free accountHave an account? Log in
Notes Panel