UNIT 3: SOIL BEHAVIOR, PERMEABILITY, CONSOLIDATION, CLASSIFICATION & STRENGTH
I. STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL MASS
A. Boussinesq's Theory
-
Assumptions:
-
Soil is homogeneous, isotropic, elastic, and semi-infinite.
-
Soil obeys Hooke's law.
-
No shear strength (only normal stresses considered).
-
Point load applied on ground surface.
-
-
Vertical Stress beneath a Point Load (P):
$$ \sigma_z = \frac{3P}{2\pi z^2} \frac{1}{\left[1 + \left(\frac{r}{z}\right)^2\right]^{5/2}} $$
Where, `z` = depth, `r` = radial distance from load axis.
-
Vertical Stress beneath a Uniformly Loaded Area:
-
Obtained by integrating Boussinesq's equation over the loaded area.
-
Equivalent Point Load Method: For rectangular areas, stress at a point can be computed using Influence Factors (I_f) from tables or charts.
-
$$ \Delta \sigma_z = q \cdot I_f $$
Where `q` = uniform load intensity.
- Isobars: Lines connecting points of equal vertical stress increase. Plotted using Influence Charts (e.g., Newmark's).
B. Westergaard's Theory
-
Assumptions:
-
Soil is anisotropic (non-erodible, layered).
-
Incompressible vertical, elastic horizontal.
-
No vertical strain (σ_x = 0).
-
-
Key Difference from Boussinesq:
-
Westergaard's vertical stress is less than Boussinesq's at the same depth and radial distance, especially for
r/z > 0.5. -
More realistic for layered soils or soils with thin, stiff strata.
-
-
Formula (for point load):
$$ \sigma_z = \frac{P}{\pi z^2} \frac{1}{(1 + 2\frac{r^2}{z^2})^{3/2}} $$
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Numerical problems often combine stresses from multiple point loads or use
I_ffor rectangular footings. Remember: Boussinesq for homogeneous, Westergaard for layered/stratified soils.
II. PERMEABILITY & SEEPAGE ANALYSIS
A. Fundamentals & Measurement
- Darcy's Law:
$$ q = k \cdot i \cdot A $$
* `q` = discharge (volume/time), `k` = coefficient of permeability (length/time), `i` = hydraulic gradient (Δh/L), `A` = cross-sectional area.
* **Limitations:** Valid for **laminar flow** in **saturated soils**, low gradients (i < 1). Not for coarse gravels or high gradients.
-
Factors Affecting
k:- Grain size (D₁₀), void ratio, soil structure, temperature, viscosity of fluid, degree of saturation.
-
Constant Head Test:
-
Procedure: Maintain constant head
hacross sample lengthL. Measure dischargeQover timet. -
Calculation:
-
$$ k = \frac{Q \cdot L}{A \cdot h \cdot t} $$
* Suitable for **coarse-grained soils** (high `k`).
-
Falling Head Test:
-
Procedure: Initial head
h₁falls toh₂in timet. Standpipe areaa, sample areaA. -
Calculation:
-
$$ k = \frac{2.303 \cdot a \cdot L}{A \cdot t} \log_{10} \frac{h_1}{h_2} $$
* Suitable for **fine-grained soils** (low `k`).
B. Stratified Soils & Equivalent Permeability
-
Horizontal Flow (Parallel to Stratification):
-
Total head loss (
Δh) is same across all layers. -
Total discharge (
q) is sum of discharges through each layer. -
Derivation:
-
$$ q = \sum_{i=1}^{n} k_i \cdot \frac{Δh}{L_i} \cdot b \cdot z_i = \frac{Δh}{L} \cdot b \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{n} k_i z_i $$
* **Equivalent `k_h` (for total thickness H = Σz_i):**
$$ \boxed{k_h = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} k_i z_i}{H}} \quad \text{(Arithmetic mean weighted by thickness)} $$
-
Vertical Flow (Normal to Stratification):
-
Discharge (
q) is same through all layers. -
Total head loss (
Δh) is sum of losses in each layer. -
Derivation:
-
$$ q = k_i \cdot \frac{Δh_i}{z_i} \cdot b \cdot B \Rightarrow Δh_i = \frac{q \cdot z_i}{k_i \cdot b \cdot B} $$
$$ Δh = \sum Δh_i = \frac{q \cdot B}{b} \sum \frac{z_i}{k_i} $$
* **Equivalent `k_v` (for total thickness H):**
$$ \boxed{k_v = \frac{H}{\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{z_i}{k_i}}} \quad \text{(Harmonic mean)} $$
C. Seepage Analysis & Flow Nets
-
Flow Net: Graphical representation of flow lines (path of water particles) and equipotential lines (equal total head).
-
Characteristics:
-
Flow lines & equipotentials intersect at right angles.
-
Equipotentials are continuous from upstream to downstream.
-
Flow channels are bounded by flow lines.
-
Curves are smooth.
-
-
Applications:
- Seepage Quantity:
$$ q = k \cdot H \cdot \frac{n_f}{n_d} \quad \text{(per unit length)} $$
* `n_f` = number of flow channels, `n_d` = number of equipotential drops.
* **Uplift Pressure:** Pressure at any point = `γ_w × (number of equipotential drops above that point)`.
* **Exit Gradient (i_exit):** Hydraulic gradient at exit point.
$$ i_{exit} = \frac{Δh \text{ (across last cell)}}{Δl \text{ (length of last flow channel)}} $$
* **Factor of Safety against Piping/Boiling:**
$$ FS = \frac{i_c}{i_{exit}} > 3 \text{ to } 4 $$
D. Seepage Forces & Critical Conditions
- Seepage Pressure (
j): Force per unit volume exerted by flowing water on soil skeleton.
$$ j = i \cdot \gamma_w \quad \text{(Direction: same as flow)} $$
-
Quick Sand Condition (Boiling):
-
Definition: Loss of shear strength in cohesionless soil due to upward seepage, causing soil particles to float and behave like a liquid.
-
Critical Hydraulic Gradient (
i_c): Gradient at which effective stress becomes zero. -
Derivation:
At boiling:
σ' = σ - u = 0→u = σ = γ_sat × zAlso,
u = γ_w × i_c × zEquating:
γ_w × i_c × z = γ_sat × z
-
$$ \boxed{i_c = \frac{\gamma_{sat}}{\gamma_w} = \frac{(G_s + e)\gamma_w}{(1+e)\gamma_w} = \frac{G_s + e}{1 + e}} $$
For **normally consolidated saturated soil**, `γ_sat ≈ (G_s + e)γ_w/(1+e)`. Often simplified to:
$$ \boxed{i_c = \frac{G_s - 1}{1 + e}} \quad \text{(if submerged unit weight used)} $$
* **Factor of Safety:**
$$ FS = \frac{i_c}{i} > 3 \text{ to } 4 $$
III. CONSOLIDATION & SETTLEMENT
A. Fundamental Concepts
-
Compaction vs. Consolidation:
| Aspect | Compaction | Consolidation | |------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------------------| | Process | Mechanical expulsion of air | Expulsion of water under load | | Soil Type | All soils (unsaturated) | Primarily saturated clays/silts | | Time | Immediate (during loading) | Time-dependent (primary: months/years) | | Volume Change| Due to air expulsion | Due to water expulsion |
-
Primary vs. Secondary Consolidation:
-
Primary: Due to dissipation of excess pore water pressure (Terzaghi's theory). Governs rate of settlement.
-
Secondary (Creep): Due to plastic rearrangement of soil particles after primary consolidation. Occurs under constant effective stress.
-
-
Drainage Conditions:
-
One-way drainage: Water escapes from one surface only (e.g., clay layer under impermeable layer). Drainage path
d = H(total thickness). -
Two-way drainage: Water escapes from both top and bottom. Drainage path
d = H/2. -
Significance: Drainage path
ddirectly affects time for consolidation (t ∝ d²).
-
B. One-Dimensional Consolidation Theory (Terzaghi)
-
Assumptions:
-
Soil is homogeneous, isotropic, saturated.
-
Water & soil particles are incompressible.
-
Flow & compression are one-dimensional (vertical).
-
Darcy's law valid.
-
Small strains, constant
k&m_vduring consolidation. -
Load is applied instantaneously and remains constant.
-
-
Differential Equation:
$$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = c_v \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial z^2} $$
Where `u` = excess pore water pressure, `c_v` = coefficient of consolidation.
- Solution & Time Factor (
T_v):
$$ T_v = \frac{c_v \cdot t}{d^2} $$
Where `d` = longest drainage path.
-
Degree of Consolidation (
U) vs.T_v:- For U ≤ 60%:
$$ T_v = \frac{\pi}{4} U^2 $$
* For **U = 60%**: `T_v = 0.197` (exact)
* For **U ≥ 60%**:
$$ T_v = 0.933 \log_{10} \frac{1}{1-U} - 0.085 $$
- Time for Consolidation:
$$ \boxed{t = \frac{T_v \cdot d^2}{c_v}} $$
C. Coefficients & Parameters
- Coefficient of Consolidation (
c_v):
$$ c_v = \frac{k}{m_v \gamma_w} \quad \text{(Units: m²/s or cm²/s)} $$
Where `k` = permeability, `m_v` = coefficient of volume compressibility.
-
Methods to Determine
c_v(from Oedometer Test):- Square Root of Time Fitting Method: For
U ≤ 60%. Plot√tvs.d(dial gauge reading).t_{50}corresponds toU=50%.
- Square Root of Time Fitting Method: For
$$ T_v = \frac{\pi}{4} U^2 \Rightarrow \text{At } U=50\%, T_v = 0.049 $$
2. **Logarithm of Time Fitting Method:** For `U ≥ 60%`. Plot `log t` vs. `d`. Find `t_{60}` from curve.
$$ \text{At } U=60\%, T_v = 0.197 \quad \Rightarrow \quad c_v = \frac{0.197 \cdot d^2}{t_{60}} $$
-
Compressibility Parameters (from e vs. log σ' plot):
- Compression Index (
C_c): Slope of virgin compression curve (normally consolidated).
- Compression Index (
$$ C_c = \frac{\Delta e}{\log \sigma'_f - \log \sigma'_0} = -\frac{\Delta e}{\Delta \log \sigma'} $$
* **Coefficient of Compressibility (`a_v`):** Slope of **recompression/expansion curve**.
$$ a_v = -\frac{\Delta e}{\Delta \sigma'} \quad \text{(Units: m²/kN)} $$
* **Coefficient of Volume Compressibility (`m_v`):**
$$ m_v = \frac{a_v}{1 + e_0} = \frac{C_c}{1 + e_0} \cdot \frac{1}{\Delta \sigma'} \quad \text{(Units: m²/kN)} $$
D. Settlement Calculations
-
Primary Consolidation Settlement (
S_c):- Normally Consolidated Clay:
$$ \boxed{S_c = \frac{C_c}{1 + e_0} H \log \frac{\sigma'_f}{\sigma'_0}} $$
* **Overconsolidated Clay:**
* If `σ'_f ≤ σ'_p` (preconsolidation pressure): Use **recompression index (`C_r`)**.
$$ S_c = \frac{C_r}{1 + e_0} H \log \frac{\sigma'_f}{\sigma'_0} $$
* If `σ'_f > σ'_p`: Use `C_c` for stress increment above `σ'_p`, and `C_r` for increment from `σ'_0` to `σ'_p`.
$$ S_c = \frac{C_r}{1 + e_0} H \log \frac{\sigma'_p}{\sigma'_0} + \frac{C_c}{1 + e_0} H \log \frac{\sigma'_f}{\sigma'_p} $$
* `H` = initial thickness of clay layer.
- Immediate Settlement (
S_i): For saturated clays, often estimated using elastic theory (S_i = \frac{q B (1-\mu^2)}{E_u} I_s), but not a primary focus in these papers.
E. Stress Concepts in Layered Systems
- Terzaghi's Effective Stress Principle:
$$ \boxed{\sigma' = \sigma - u} $$
* `σ'` = effective stress (governs strength & deformation).
* `σ` = total stress (from overburden & loads).
* `u` = pore water pressure (neutral stress).
-
Total, Neutral, Effective Stress Diagrams:
-
Water Table Below G.S. with Partial Saturation (Sr < 100%):
-
Above WT:
σ = γ_d × depth + γ_sat × (depth below top of sat. zone).u = 0(capillary pressure negative, often ignored in basic analysis).σ' ≈ σ. -
Below WT:
σincreases withγ_sat.u = γ_w × (depth below WT).σ' = σ - u.
-
-
Water Table at G.S.:
-
σincreases withγ_satfrom surface. -
u = γ_w × depth(from surface). -
σ' = (γ_sat - γ_w) × depth = γ' × depth(submerged unit weight).
-
-
IV. SOIL CLASSIFICATION (Grain Size & Plasticity)
A. Grain Size Analysis
-
Sieve Analysis: For coarse-grained soils (gravel & sand). Results plotted on semi-log graph (particle size vs. % finer).
-
Hydrometer Analysis: For fine-grained soils (silt & clay). Based on Stokes' Law (terminal velocity of settling particles).
-
Gradation Parameters:
- Uniformity Coefficient:
$$ \boxed{C_u = \frac{D_{60}}{D_{10}}} $$
* **Coefficient of Curvature:**
$$ \boxed{C_c = \frac{(D_{30})^2}{D_{60} \times D_{10}}} $$
-
Interpretation (for coarse-grained soils):
-
Well-graded (GW, SW):
C_u ≥ 4(gravel) or≥ 6(sand) ANDC_cbetween 1 and 3. -
Poorly-graded (GP, SP): Fails either
C_uorC_ccriteria. -
Gap-graded: Missing intermediate sizes (not captured by
C_u,C_c).
-
B. Consistency & Plasticity of Fine-Grained Soils
-
Atterberg Limits:
-
Liquid Limit (LL): Water content at which soil changes from plastic to liquid state (Casagrande cup, 25 blows).
-
Plastic Limit (PL): Water content at which soil changes from semi-solid to plastic state (thread rolling).
-
Plasticity Index (PI or
I_p):
-
$$ \boxed{I_p = LL - PL} $$
-
Consistency Terms (based on natural water content
wrelative to LL & PL):-
Liquid:
w > LL -
Plastic:
PL < w < LL -
Semi-solid:
PL > w > Shrinkage Limit (SL) -
Solid:
w < SL
-
C. IS Soil Classification System (Detailed)
-
Coarse-Grained (Gravels & Sands): Classified by grain size (gravel
> 4.75mm, sand4.75-0.075mm) and gradation.-
Well-graded:
W(e.g., GW, SW). -
Poorly-graded:
P(e.g., GP, SP). -
Silty/Clayey:
M(silty),C(clayey) if fines > 12% (by weight). Dual symbols (e.g., SC-SM) if fines 5-12%.
-
-
Fine-Grained (Silts & Clays): Classified using Plasticity Chart.
-
A-line:
I_p = 0.73 (LL - 20) -
U-line:
I_p = 0.9 (LL - 8)(upper bound of plasticity). -
Classification:
| Symbol | Description | Region on Chart | |------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------| | CL | Low plasticity clay | Below A-line, LL ≥ 35? (Check) | | CI | Intermediate plasticity clay | On A-line? (Rare) | | CH | High plasticity clay | Above A-line | | ML | Low plasticity silt (inorganic) | Below A-line, LL < 50 | | MI | Intermediate plasticity silt | On A-line? (Rare) | | MH | High plasticity silt (inorganic) | Above A-line, LL < 50 |
-
Organic Soils:
Pt(Peat) – high organic content, dark color, fibrous.
-
-
Procedure: 1) % Gravel/Sand/Silt/Clay (sieve + hydrometer). 2) Check coarse fraction gradation (
C_u,C_c). 3) For fines > 12%, plot on plasticity chart.
D. Other Classification Systems
-
Textural Classification (Triangular Diagram):
-
Based on relative proportions of sand, silt, and clay fractions (by weight).
-
Soil falls into one of 12 textural classes (e.g., sandy clay loam, silty clay).
-
Used primarily in agricultural soil science.
-
-
AASHTO Classification:
-
Groups A-1 to A-8 based on grain size & plasticity.
-
Group Index (
GI) quantifies plasticity & fines content:
-
$$ GI = 0.2a + 0.005ac + 0.01bd $$
Where `a = (LL - 40)`, `b = (LL - 40)`, `c = (PI - 10)`, `d = (PI - 10)` (use positive values only).
V. SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOILS
A. Fundamentals
-
How Soils Attain Shear Strength:
-
Cohesionless ( Sands): Frictional resistance from inter-particle contact & interlocking.
-
Cohesive (Clays): True cohesion (electro-chemical bonding) + friction.
-
-
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Envelope:
$$ \boxed{\tau = c + \sigma' \tan \phi} $$
* `τ` = shear strength, `σ'` = effective normal stress on failure plane.
* `c` = **cohesion** (total stress param for UU tests), `c'` = **effective cohesion**.
* `φ` = **angle of internal friction** (total stress param for UU tests), `φ'` = **effective friction angle**.
-
Total Stress vs. Effective Stress Parameters:
-
Total Stress Parameters (
c,φ): Used for undrained conditions (short-term, saturated clays). Pore water pressure not measured/controlled. -
Effective Stress Parameters (
c',φ'): Used for drained conditions (long-term) or when pore pressure is measured/controlled. Fundamental for stability analysis.
-
B. Laboratory Shear Strength Tests
-
Direct Shear Test:
-
Procedure: Soil sample in a split box. Apply vertical load (
σ), then shear horizontally. -
Advantages: Simple, fast, good for friction angle of sands, residual strength.
-
Disadvantages: Plane of weakness (box interface), non-uniform stress distribution, cannot measure pore pressure.
-
Failure Plane: Predetermined (horizontal plane at box joint).
-
-
Triaxial Compression Test (Three Standard Types):
-
CD (Consolidated Drained):
-
Procedure: Sample consolidated under cell pressure (
σ₃), then sheared slowly with drainage open (pore pressure dissipates). -
Measures:
c',φ'(effective parameters). -
Use: Long-term stability (dams, slopes).
-
-
CU (Consolidated Undrained):
-
Procedure: Sample consolidated under
σ₃(drainage open), then sheared quickly with drainage closed (undrained). -
With Pore Pressure Measurement: Measures
c',φ'(effective). Pore pressure parameterAdetermined. -
Without Pore Pressure Measurement: Measures undrained shear strength
c_uandφ_u(often ≈ 0 for saturated clays). Total stress parameters. -
Use: Short-term stability (saturated clays).
-
-
UU (Unconsolidated Undrained):
-
Procedure: No prior consolidation. Sample sheared quickly from initial state with drainage closed.
-
Measures: Undrained shear strength
c_u(depends on water content). For saturated clays,φ_u = 0. -
Use: Quick assessment of
c_ufor saturated clays.
-
-
-
Unconfined Compression Test (UCS):
-
Special case of UU test with
σ₃ = 0. -
Cylindrical sample compressed axially until failure.
-
For saturated clays:
φ_u = 0, so failure envelope is horizontal. -
Undrained Shear Strength:
-
$$ \boxed{c_u = \frac{\text{UCS}}{2}} $$
* **Suitable for:** **Saturated, cohesive soils** (clays, silts).
C. Strength Parameters from Test Data
-
Plotting Mohr Circles (Triaxial Test):
-
For each test at confining pressure
σ₃, plot Mohr circle with:-
Center:
(σ₁ + σ₃)/2 -
Radius:
(σ₁ - σ₃)/2
-
-
Failure Envelope: Tangent to all Mohr circles at failure.
-
Effective Stress Analysis: Use effective principal stresses (
σ₁' = σ₁ - u_f,σ₃' = σ₃ - u). Envelope givesc',φ'. -
Total Stress Analysis (UU): Use total
σ₁,σ₃. Horizontal envelope givesc_u,φ_u = 0.
-
-
Numerical Problem: Given
σ₃and failureσ₁(or axial stress at failure), findc,φ.-
For CU/UU (total stress): Use
c = (σ₁ - σ₃)/2ifφ_u = 0. Otherwise, solve from two circles. -
For CD/CU (effective): Need pore pressure
u_fto getσ₁',σ₃'.
-
VI. COMPACTION
A. Definition & Purpose
-
Compaction: Mechanical process of densifying soil by expelling air from voids (for unsaturated soils). Increases dry density.
-
Objectives:
-
Increase shear strength & bearing capacity.
-
Decrease compressibility & settlement.
-
Decrease permeability.
-
Control swelling/shrinkage (clays).
-
-
Compaction vs. Consolidation: (See Table in III.A)
B. Standard Laboratory Tests
-
Standard Proctor Test (IS Light Compaction):
-
Mold volume: 944 cm³.
-
Hammer: 2.5 kg, drop: 305 mm.
-
Layers: 3, Blows per layer: 25.
-
Energy: 600 kN-m/m³.
-
-
Modified Proctor Test (IS Heavy Compaction):
-
Mold volume: 944 cm³.
-
Hammer: 4.9 kg, drop: 457 mm.
-
Layers: 5, Blows per layer: 25.
-
Energy: 2700 kN-m/m³.
-
-
Comparison:
| Feature | Standard Proctor | Modified Proctor | |-------------------|----------------------|----------------------| | Energy | 600 kN-m/m³ | 2700 kN-m/m³ | | OMC | Higher | Lower | | MDD | Lower | Higher | | Use | Low-energy fills, subgrade | Highways, dams, heavy fills |
C. Compaction Curve & Concepts
-
Compaction Curve: Plot of Dry Density (
ρ_d) vs. Water Content (w).-
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC): Water content at maximum dry density (MDD).
-
MDD: Maximum dry density achievable with given compaction effort.
-
-
Zero Air Void Line (100% Saturation):
- Equation for dry density at full saturation:
$$ \boxed{\rho_d = \frac{G_s \rho_w}{1 + w}} \quad \text{or} \quad \boxed{w = \frac{G_s \gamma_w}{\gamma_d} - 1} $$
* Plotted on compaction curve. Shows theoretical limit; actual compaction occurs **below** this line.
- Degree of Saturation on Compaction Curve:
$$ S_r = \frac{w G_s}{e} \quad \text{and} \quad e = \frac{G_s \gamma_w}{\gamma_d} - 1 $$
Can compute `S_r` at any point on curve.
D. Field Compaction
-
Equipment:
-
Smooth-wheel rollers: Granular soils, final sealing.
-
Sheepsfoot rollers: Cohesive soils, deep compaction.
-
Pneumatic tyred rollers: Flexible kneading action, all soils.
-
Vibratory rollers: Granular soils, high density.
-
-
Field Density Tests:
-
Core Cutter Method: For cohesive soils. Drive cylinder, weigh wet & dry.
-
Sand Replacement Method: For cohesive & granular soils. Excavate hole, replace with known volume of sand.
-
VII. SOIL IMPROVEMENT & GEOSYNTHETICS
A. Methods of Soil Stabilization
-
Mechanical Stabilization: Blending soils (e.g., sand with clay) + compaction.
-
Chemical Stabilization:
-
Cement Stabilization:
-
Mechanism: Cement reacts with soil silicates/aluminates to form cementing compounds (C-S-H, C-A-H).
-
Applications: Road subgrades, airfields, foundations in weak soils.
-
Mix Design Factors: Soil type (fines content, plasticity), cement content, water content, curing period.
-
-
Lime Stabilization: For high-plasticity clays. Reduces plasticity, increases strength.
-
Bitumen: For waterproofing & binding (road bases).
-
Fly Ash: Pozzolanic reaction, fills voids.
-
B. Geosynthetics
-
Types:
-
Geotextiles: Woven/non-woven fabrics (separation, filtration).
-
Geogrids: Grid-like (high tensile strength, reinforcement).
-
Geomembranes: Impervious sheets (barrier).
-
Geocells: 3D cellular structure (confinement).
-
Geocomposites: Combinations (e.g., geonet + geotextile = drainage composite).
-
-
Functions & Applications:
| Function | Description | Example Application | |----------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------| | Separation | Prevent mixing of dissimilar soils | Road subgrade over soft clay | | Reinforcement | Tensile strength to resist loads | Reinforced retaining walls, slopes | | Filtration | Allow flow but retain soil particles | Behind retaining walls, drainage trenches | | Drainage | Collect & convey seepage | Landfill leachate collection, roof drainage| | Protection | Protect geomembranes from puncture | Landfill liners | | Barrier | Prevent fluid migration | Landfill liners, pond liners |
VIII. SPECIAL TOPICS & CONCEPTS
A. Liquefaction
-
Phenomenon: Loss of shear strength & stiffness in saturated, loose, fine sandy soils due to cyclic loading (e.g., earthquakes).
-
Mechanism: Cyclic loading increases pore water pressure (
u), decreases effective stress (σ'), leading to flow-like behavior. -
Susceptibility Factors: Loose saturation, fine sand/silty sand, shallow water table, high seismic intensity.
B. Quick Condition (Boiling)
-
Definition: Upward seepage force equals submerged unit weight, causing effective stress to become zero. Soil behaves like a liquid.
-
Critical Hydraulic Gradient:
$$ i_c = \frac{G_s - 1}{1 + e} $$
- Factor of Safety:
$$ FS = \frac{i_c}{i} \quad (\text{Required } FS > 3) $$
C. Seepage Pressure
-
Definition: The drag force exerted by flowing water on the soil skeleton.
-
Expression:
$$ j = i \cdot \gamma_w \quad (\text{Units: kN/m³}) $$
-
Direction: Same as flow direction.
-
Effect on Effective Stress:
-
Downward flow:
σ' = σ - (u - j)→ increases effective stress. -
Upward flow:
σ' = σ - (u + j)→ decreases effective stress (can cause boiling).
-
\boxed{\text{END OF UNIT 3 NOTES}}