Skip to content
ME-602 · Machine Component and Design/Quick Revision Short Notes

Machine Component and Design (ME-602) - Unit 3 Short Notes

UNIT 3: MACHINE COMPONENT AND DESIGN - EXAM-FOCUSED SHORT NOTES


1.0 FATIGUE AND FAILURE ANALYSIS

1.1 Stress Concentration

  • Definition: Localized increase in stress due to geometric discontinuities (holes, notches, fillets, keyways), material defects, or abrupt load changes.

  • Stress Concentration Factor (Kt): Ratio of maximum theoretical stress to nominal stress.

$$K_t = \frac{\sigma_{max}}{\sigma_{nom}}$$

*   **Theoretical Kt:** From elastic stress analysis (depends only on geometry).

*   **Experimental Kt:** From strain gauge measurements.
  • Dynamic Loading Consideration: Use fatigue stress concentration factor (Kf) instead of Kt.

$$K_f = 1 + q(K_t - 1)$$

where `q` is the notch sensitivity factor.
  • Methods to Reduce Stress Concentration:

    • Use generous fillets at corners.

    • Provide grooves or relief notches.

    • Avoid sharp corners; use gradual tapers.

    • Align holes perpendicular to stress axis.

    • Select ductile materials (higher notch sensitivity q).

[!TIP] Exam Focus: Kt is always ≥ 1. For static loading, use Kt. For fatigue, use Kf. Kf ≤ Kt.

1.2 Notch Sensitivity

  • Definition: Material's susceptibility to having its fatigue strength reduced by a stress concentration. Not all materials are equally sensitive.

  • Notch Sensitivity Factor (q): Ranges from 0 (fully insensitive, like very ductile metals) to 1 (fully sensitive, like brittle materials).

  • Key Relationship: Kf bridges theoretical stress (Kt) and actual fatigue stress.

$$\boxed{K_f = 1 + q(K_t - 1)}$$

1.3 S-N Curve (Wöhler Curve)

  • Definition: Plot of stress amplitude (S) vs. number of cycles to failure (N) on log-log scale.

  • Key Features:

    • Endurance Limit (σe): Stress below which failure does not occur for infinite life (typically >10^6 cycles for ferrous metals).

    • Endurance Strength: Stress at a specified finite number of cycles (e.g., 10^6 cycles).

  • Factors Affecting S-N Curve (Marin Factors): Surface finish (k_a), size (k_b), loading type (k_c), temperature (k_d), reliability (k_e).

$$\sigma_e' = \sigma_e \times k_a \times k_b \times k_c \times k_d \times k_e$$

where `σe'` is the modified endurance limit.

1.4 Fatigue Failure Criteria & Diagrams

Used to design for fluctuating stresses (σ_max, σ_min) with a Factor of Safety (n).

Criterion Equation (for n=1) Diagram Conservatism
Goodman $$\displaystyle \frac{\sigma_a}{\sigma_e} + \frac{\sigma_m}{\sigma_{ut}} = 1 $$ Line joining (σ_e, 0) to (0, σ_ut) Moderately conservative
Modified Goodman $$\displaystyle \frac{\sigma_a}{\sigma_e} + \frac{\sigma_m}{\sigma_{ut}} = 1 $$ Same line, but uses σ_ut More conservative (uses ultimate)
Soderberg $$\displaystyle \frac{\sigma_a}{\sigma_e} + \frac{\sigma_m}{\sigma_y} = 1 $$ Line joining (σ_e, 0) to (0, σ_y) Most conservative (uses yield)
  • σ_a = Alternating stress = (σ_max - σ_min)/2

  • σ_m = Mean stress = (σ_max + σ_min)/2

  • Application: Rearrange to find minimum required ultimate strength (σ_ut) or yield strength (σ_y) for safe design.

[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Soderberg is safest but often overly conservative. Modified Goodman is widely used. Always check which criterion the question specifies.

1.5 Factors Affecting Fatigue Strength (Marin Factors)

  • Surface Finish Factor (k_a): Accounts for surface roughness. Ground/polished > Machined > Hot-rolled > As-forged.

    • Empirical: $$\displaystyle k_a = A \cdot (S_{ut})^b $$ (A, b from tables).
  • Size Factor (k_b): Larger volumes have higher probability of defects. k_b < 1 for large diameters.

  • Load Factor (k_c): Accounts for load type (k_c=1.0 for bending, 0.85 for axial, 0.75 for torsion).

  • Temperature Factor (k_d): k_d < 1 for elevated temperatures.

  • Reliability Factor (k_e): Higher reliability (e.g., 99% vs 50%) requires lower stress. k_e < 1.


2.0 SHAFT DESIGN

2.1 Fundamentals

  • Types: Transmission shafts (power), Machine shafts (support parts), Axles (support rotating parts, no torque).

  • Stresses:

    • Torsional Shear: $$\displaystyle \tau_t = \frac{T \cdot r}{J_p} = \frac{16T}{\pi d^3} $$ (solid)

    • Bending (Normal): $$\displaystyle \sigma_b = \frac{M \cdot y}{I} = \frac{32M}{\pi d^3} $$ (solid)

    • Axial: $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = \frac{P}{A} $$

  • Equivalent Moments (for combined bending & torsion):

    • Equivalent Twisting Moment (T_e): Used for shear stress design (Tresca).

$$T_e = \sqrt{M^2 + T^2}$$

*   **Equivalent Bending Moment (M_e):** Used for **normal stress** design (Rankine).

$$M_e = \sqrt{M^2 + \left(\frac{T}{2}\right)^2} \quad \text{or} \quad M_e = \frac{1}{2}\left[ M + \sqrt{M^2 + T^2} \right]$$

2.2 Design for Strength & Stiffness

  • Maximum Shear Stress Theory (Tresca): Failure when max shear stress reaches yield shear stress.

$$\tau_{max} = \frac{T_e}{2Z_p} \leq \frac{S_y}{n}$$

  • Maximum Normal Stress Theory (Rankine): Failure when max normal stress reaches yield tensile stress.

$$\sigma_{max} = \frac{M_e}{Z} \leq \frac{S_y}{n}$$

  • ASME Code: Uses a stress concentration factor (Kt or Kf) and considers both steady and alternating stresses. Design equation often involves an allowable stress S_a or S_m.

  • Diameter Calculation: Solve for d from the chosen theory's inequality using section modulus Z or polar modulus Z_p.

2.3 Hollow vs. Solid Shafts

  • For Equal Weight (Material): Hollow shaft has higher strength and stiffness.

    • Strength ratio: $$\displaystyle \frac{Z_{p,hollow}}{Z_{p,solid}} = \frac{1 - (d_i/d_o)^4}{1 - (d_i/d_o)^3} \cdot \frac{1}{1 - (d_i/d_o)^4} $$ (simplifies to >1 for d_i/d_o > 0.58).
  • Design: Subject to torque T, max shear stress τ_max, and max twist θ.

$$\tau_{max} = \frac{T \cdot (d_o/2)}{J_p} = \frac{16T}{\pi (d_o^4 - d_i^4)} \cdot d_o$$

$$\theta = \frac{T \cdot L}{G \cdot J_p}$$

Solve for `d_o` and `d_i` simultaneously.

2.4 Section Properties

  • Polar Modulus (Z_p): Resistance to torsion.

    • Solid Circular: $$\displaystyle Z_p = \frac{J_p}{c} = \frac{\pi d^3}{16} $$

    • Hollow Circular: $$\displaystyle Z_p = \frac{\pi (d_o^4 - d_i^4)}{16 d_o} $$

    • Significance: $$\displaystyle \tau_{max} = \frac{T}{Z_p} $$


3.0 KEYS, COUPLINGS, AND THREADED COMPONENTS

3.1 Keys

  • Classification:

    • Sunk Keys: Fit into keyways on shaft & hub (Parallel, Saddle, Gib-head).

    • Tangent Keys: Two keys at 90° for heavy torque.

    • Round Keys: For low torque, no keyway needed on shaft.

  • Saddle Key vs. Sunk Key:

    | Feature | Saddle Key | Sunk Key | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Fit | Sits in hub keyway, rests on shaft | Fits into keyways on both shaft & hub | | Torque Capacity | Low (friction only) | High (shear & crushing) | | Axial Movement | Possible | Prevented | | Application | Light duty, sliding hubs | General power transmission |

  • Key Design Stresses:

    • Shear Failure: $$\displaystyle \tau = \frac{T}{l \cdot b \cdot (d/2)} \leq \frac{S_{sy}}{n} $$

    • Crushing (Bearing) Failure: $$\displaystyle \sigma_c = \frac{2T}{l \cdot b \cdot (d/2)} \leq \frac{S_{sy}}{n} $$

    • l = key length, b = width, d = shaft diameter.

  • Forces on Key: Transmits torque T via shear on key area and bearing pressure on keyway walls.

3.2 Shaft Couplings

  • Rigid Couplings: No misalignment accommodation.

    • Sleeve: Simple, for small shafts, precise alignment.

    • Clamp/Compression: Split, for larger shafts.

    • Flange: Most common, uses bolts.

  • Flexible Couplings: Accommodate misalignment (angular, parallel, axial) & damp vibration.

    • Muff/Coupling: Elastic elements (rubber, leather).

    • Disc: Stainless steel discs, high torque, no lubrication.

    • Jaw/Spider: Elastomer spider in jaws.

    • Oldham: For parallel offset, three parts.

    • Universal: For angular misalignment, high torque.

  • Distinction: Rigid = precise alignment, no flexibility. Flexible = allows misalignment, absorbs shock.

3.3 Threaded Components & Power Screws

  • Thread Forms:

    • Square Thread: High efficiency, low friction, hard to manufacture. Preferable for power transmission (jacks, lead screws).

    • V-Thread (Metric/Unified): Easy to manufacture, high friction, self-locking. Used for fasteners.

  • Self-Locking: Condition: $$\displaystyle \tan(\lambda) < \mu $$, where λ = lead angle, μ = friction coefficient.

    • Necessity: Prevents back-driving (load lowers screw when force removed). Essential for lifting screws (jacks, vises).
  • Overhauling: When $$\displaystyle \tan(\lambda) > \mu $$, screw back-drives under load. Unacceptable for lifting.

  • Efficiency Proof (Self-Locking < 50%):

$$\eta = \frac{\tan(\lambda)}{\tan(\lambda + \phi)} < 0.5 \quad \text{when} \quad \tan(\lambda) < \mu = \tan(\phi)$$

For self-locking, `λ < φ`. Max efficiency for self-locking occurs when `λ → φ`, then `η → 0.5`.

4.0 SPRING DESIGN

4.1 Classification

  • By Shape: Helical (compression, extension, torsion), Leaf, Spiral, Disc (Belleville).

  • Stress Indication:

    • Helical (close-coil): Bending in wire.

    • Torsion Spring: Torsion in wire.

    • Leaf Spring: Bending in leaves.

4.2 Helical Spring Fundamentals

  • Close-coiled: Helix angle small (~5°), used for compression/extension. Wires under torsion.

  • Open-coiled: Helix angle large, used for torsion springs.

  • Spring Index (C): $$\displaystyle C = D/d $$ (mean coil dia / wire dia). Typical: 4-12.

  • Spring Rate (k): $$\displaystyle k = F/\delta $$ (N/mm).

  • Deflection (δ): $$\displaystyle \delta = \frac{8FD^3n}{Gd^4} $$ (for close-coil).

  • Solid Length: $$\displaystyle L_s = n_s \cdot d $$ (all coils touching).

4.3 Design Calculations

  • Shear Stress (with Wahl Correction Factor C_f for curvature):

$$ \tau = C_f \cdot \frac{8FD}{\pi d^3} \quad \text{where} \quad C_f = \frac{4C-1}{4C-4} + \frac{0.615}{C} $$

*   `C_f` accounts for stress gradient; increases as `C` decreases.
  • Design Steps:

    1. From load F and deflection δ, find d and n using $\delta$ formula.

    2. Check shear stress τ with C_f. Iterate if needed.

    3. Check buckling for compression springs: $$\displaystyle L_o/D < \text{limit} $$ (use slenderness ratio).

    4. Check solid length, free length, etc.

4.4 Applications & Limitations

  • Why Compression > Extension?

    • Compression springs don't need special end coils for attachment.

    • No risk of buckling (for compression, need guides).

    • Extension springs require initial tension and hooks/loops (stress concentrations).

  • Buckling: Long, slender compression springs can buckle if unsupported. Critical free length $$\displaystyle L_o $$ depends on end condition and $D$.


5.0 CLUTCHES AND BRAKES

5.1 Clutches

  • Centrifugal Clutch:

    • Working: Shoes (with friction lining) mounted on spider. At low speed, springs hold shoes in. As speed increases, centrifugal force throws shoes outward to engage drum.

    • Key Parameters: Engagement speed (set by spring force), centrifugal force, shoe geometry, coefficient of friction.

  • Single Plate Clutch (Theory):

    • Uniform Pressure (p = constant): Assumes new clutch. Pressure p uniform across friction surface.

$$T = \mu p \pi (r_o^2 - r_i^2) \cdot \frac{r_o + r_i}{2}$$

$$F = p \cdot \pi (r_o^2 - r_i^2)$$

*   **Uniform Wear (p.r = constant):** Assumes worn clutch. Pressure inversely proportional to radius.

$$T = \frac{2}{3} \mu F (r_o^2 - r_i^2) \cdot \frac{r_o^3 - r_i^3}{r_o^2 - r_i^2}$$

$$F = 2\pi p_i r_i^2 \quad (\text{where } p_i \text{ is pressure at inner radius})$$

*   **Design:** Given `T`, `μ`, pressure limit `p_max`, and `r_o/r_i` ratio, solve for `r_o`, `r_i`, and axial force `F`.

5.2 Brakes

  • Classification:

    • Block Brakes: Simple, shoe presses on drum (rope, band types).

    • Band Brake: Flexible band around drum. Self-energizing if leading shoe.

    • Internal Expanding (Shoe) Brake: Two shoes inside drum (automobiles). Can be self-energizing.

    • Disc Brake: Caliper with pads on disc. Excellent heat dissipation.

  • Comparison:

    | Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Rope/Band | Simple, low cost | Low torque, wear uneven | | Block | Robust | High wear, needs adjustment | | Internal Expanding | Self-energizing, good torque | Complex, heat in drum | | Disc | Excellent cooling, stable | Expensive, caliper design |

  • Self-Energizing Brake: Friction force on leading shoe aids the applied force. Condition for self-locking (no release): $$\displaystyle \tan(\alpha) > \mu $$, where α = angle of wrap on leading shoe.

  • Internal Expanding Brake (Short Note): Two semicircular shoes pivoted on anchor pin. When force applied, shoes push against drum. Leading/trailing shoe arrangement. Self-energizing effect on leading shoe increases braking torque.

5.3 Friction Materials

  • Properties: High & stable μ, good wear resistance, high heat resistance (fade resistance), adequate strength, quiet operation.

  • Common Materials: Asbestos-based (older), Sintered metals (metal powders), Organic composites (resin + fibers), Ceramics (high performance).


6.0 BEARINGS

6.1 Classification & Fundamentals

  • Sliding Contact: Journal (radial), Thrust/Footstep (axial). Hydrodynamic (full film) or Boundary lubrication.

  • Rolling Contact: Ball, Roller (cylindrical, tapered, spherical). Anti-friction bearings.

  • Journal Bearing: Supports radial load on rotating shaft. Requires lubrication film.

6.2 Sliding Contact Bearings (Footstep/Thrust)

  • Design Theories:

    • Uniform Pressure: Assumes pressure p uniform over entire bearing surface.

$$p = \frac{W}{\pi (D^2 - d_i^2)/4}$$

    Mean radius $$\displaystyle R_m = (D + d_i)/4 $$.

*   **Uniform Wear:** Assumes `p.r = constant` (wear proportional to pressure-sliding distance). More realistic for worn bearings.

$$p_{max} = \frac{2W}{\pi D (D - d_i)}$$

    Mean radius $$\displaystyle R_m = (D^2 + d_i^2)/(4D) $$.
  • Footstep Bearing Design (with counterbore):

    • Load Capacity (Pressure Limit): Use p_max from uniform wear theory.

    • Power Lost in Friction:

$$P_f = \mu W \cdot (2\pi n) \cdot R_m \quad (\text{Watts})$$

    where `R_m` is mean radius from chosen theory, `n` = rpm.

6.3 Rolling Contact Bearings

  • Dynamic Load Capacity (C): Load a bearing can withstand for 1 million revolutions with 90% reliability (L10 life).

  • Bearing Life (L10): Life that 90% of bearings exceed.

$$\boxed{L_{10} = \left( \frac{C}{P} \right)^p}$$

*   `L10` = life in millions of revolutions.

*   `P` = equivalent dynamic bearing load.

*   `p` = exponent (3 for ball bearings, 10/3 for roller bearings).

*   **Life in hours:** $$\displaystyle L_{10h} = \frac{10^6}{60 \cdot n} \cdot L_{10} $$, where `n` = rpm.
  • Factors Affecting Life: Load (primary), speed, lubrication quality, contamination, mounting/alignment, material/heat treatment.

  • Bearing Characteristic Number: Dimensionless group related to minimum oil film thickness in hydrodynamic lubrication. Higher number = better lubrication.

  • Reliability Adjustment: For reliability R ≠ 90%, use adjustment factor a_R:

$$C_{required} = a_R \cdot C_{from\ L10\ equation}$$

`a_R` > 1 for higher reliability (e.g., 99%).
  • Selection Procedure:

    1. Calculate equivalent load P from radial/axial loads.

    2. Determine required life L10h from operating hours & rpm.

    3. Use $$\displaystyle C = P \cdot (L_{10})^{1/p} $$ to find required C.

    4. Apply reliability factor if needed.

    5. Select standard bearing with C ≥ C_required.


7.0 SPECIAL TOPICS (Integrated Above)

  • Internal Expanding Brakes: See 5.2.

  • Bearing Life: See 6.3 (L10 equation).

  • Dimensionless Numbers: Bearing characteristic number, (C/P)^p in life equation.

  • Polar Modulus of Shaft: See 2.4 ($$\displaystyle Z_p = J_p/c $$).

DiagramSEARCH: Goodman diagram Modified Goodman Soderberg diagram comparison
DiagramSEARCH: footstep bearing pressure distribution uniform wear uniform pressure
DiagramSEARCH: single plate clutch uniform pressure uniform wear theory
Go to where you left off?

Quick Add to Notes

Save questions, your own notes and screenshots into notes filed by unit. It takes a free account.

Create free account

Have an account? Log in