Skip to content
CE-802 (D) · Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures/Quick Revision Short Notes

Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (CE-802 (D)) - Unit 1 Short Notes

UNIT 1: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES


I. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION & SOIL SAMPLING

A. Planning & Execution of Exploration

  • Significance: Determines soil stratigraphy, properties, and groundwater to design safe, economical foundations.

  • IS Code Criteria (IS 1892:2016):

    • Depth: Boreholes should penetrate at least 3 m into bedrock or a depth where stress increase < 10% of net foundation stress.

    • Spacing: For uniform sites, grid pattern with spacing ≤ 30 m; for variable sites, ≤ 15 m.

  • Boring Methods:

    • Auger Boring: Hand/manual, for shallow depths (< 6 m), soft soils. Disturbed samples.

    • Shell & Auger Boring: For medium depths, loose/soft soils. Uses bailer.

    • Rotary Drilling (Detailed): Uses rotary motion with core barrel/drill bit. Advantages: Fast, good for hard strata, allows undisturbed sampling (using Shelby tubes). Types: Mud rotary, dry rotary.

    • Percussion Drilling: Chiseling action. For boulders/hard strata. Slow, highly disturbed samples.

  • Geophysical Methods:

    • Seismic Refraction: Measures velocity of seismic waves to infer stratum boundaries & rock depth.

    • Electrical Resistivity: Measures soil resistivity to detect changes in lithology, water content, contamination.

[!TIP] Exam Focus: IS 1892 criteria for borehole depth/spacing are frequently asked. Differentiate rotary (best for undisturbed samples) vs percussion (for hard strata).

B. In-Situ Testing

  • Standard Penetration Test (SPT):

    • Procedure: Drive a split spoon sampler (50 mm ID, 60 mm OD) with a 65 kg hammer falling 750 mm. Count blows for 30 cm penetration after seating drive of 15 cm. N-value = blows for last 30 cm.

    • Significance of N-value: Index of soil density/consistency, correlates with relative density (sand), undrained shear strength (clay), and settlement estimates.

  • Corrections to SPT N-value:

    1. Overburden Pressure Correction (Normalization): \( N_{corrected} = N_{observed} \times \frac{100}{\sigma'_{v0}} \) (for sand, \(\sigma'_{v0}\) in kPa). Standardizes N to 100 kPa overburden.

    2. Dilatancy Correction (for Dense Sand/Stiff Clay): \( N_{corrected} = N_{measured} \text{ (if } N_{measured} < 15) \); else \( N_{corrected} = 15 + 0.5(N_{measured} - 15) \). Corrects for negative friction/volume increase.

    3. Energy Correction: \( N_{60} = N_{field} \times \frac{ER_{field}}{60\%} \). Converts to standard energy ratio (60%). Common hammers: Donut (30-42%), Safety (50-60%), Automatic (60-80%).

    \boxed{N_{60} = N_{field} \times \frac{ER_{field}}{60%}}

  • Cone Penetration Test (CPT):

    • Equipment: Pushed at constant rate (20 mm/s). Measures tip resistance (q_c) and sleeve friction (f_s) continuously.

    • Types: CPT (mechanical), SCPT (with pore pressure transducer - measures u₂).

    • Advantages over SPT: Continuous profile, faster, more repeatable, provides friction ratio (R_f = f_s/q_c × 100%), better for soft soils & stratification.

C. Soil Sampling

  • Disturbed vs. Undisturbed:

    • Disturbed: Structure altered. Used for classification, water content, compaction tests.

    • Undisturbed: Structure preserved. Used for consolidation, permeability, triaxial tests.

  • Sampling Tube Design Parameters:

    • Inside Clearance (C_i): \( C_i = \frac{D_i - D_s}{D_s} \times 100\% \). Typical: 0.5-1.0%. Allows sample expansion.

    • Outside Clearance (C_o): \( C_o = \frac{D_h - D_o}{D_o} \times 100\% \). Reduces friction during driving. Typical: < 2%.

    • Area Ratio (A_r): \( A_r = \frac{(D_h^2 - D_i^2)}{D_i^2} \times 100\% \). < 10% for good-quality undisturbed sample. Lower = less disturbance.

  • Criteria for Good Quality Undisturbed Sample: Minimal distortion, no air voids, ends parallel, length > 2× diameter.

  • Borelog Report Components: Borehole location/depth, soil description (color, consistency), depth of samples, SPT N-values, water table depth, lab test results, graphical log.


II. BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS

A. Fundamental Concepts & Definitions

  • Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u): Max pressure soil can withstand before shear failure.

  • Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_net,u): \( q_{net,u} = q_u - \gamma D_f \). Excludes overburden pressure.

  • Net Safe Bearing Capacity (q_net,s): \( q_{net,s} = \frac{q_{net,u}}{FOS} \). Allowable net pressure.

  • Allowable Bearing Pressure (q_all): \( q_{all} = q_{net,s} + \gamma D_f \). Total allowable pressure at foundation base.

  • Gross Pressure: Total pressure applied at base (includes surcharge + structural load).

  • Factors Influencing Capacity: Soil properties (c, φ, γ), foundation dimensions (B, L), depth (D_f), load inclination, water table.

B. Theories of Failure & Capacity

  • Modes of Shear Failure:

    • General Shear: Dense sand/ stiff clay. Sudden failure, well-defined failure surface, large settlements.

    • Local Shear: Medium-dense sand/ medium clay. Progressive failure, limited surface heave.

    • Punching Shear: Very loose sand/ soft clay. Failure surface confined under footing, minimal heave.

    Sketch Required: Show failure surfaces for each mode.

  • Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory (1943):

    • Assumptions: Strip footing, φ > 0°, base rough, soil homogeneous, load vertical, failure surface as log spiral + linear rays.

    • Equation (Strip): \( q_u = c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma \)

    • Shape Factors (for Square/Circular):

      • Square: \( q_u = 1.3c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.4 \gamma B N_\gamma \)

      • Circular: \( q_u = 1.3c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.3 \gamma B N_\gamma \)

    • IS Code (BIS) Method (IS 6403:1981): Uses shape factors (s_c, s_q, s_γ) and depth factors (d_c, d_q, d_γ). More comprehensive.

      \boxed{q_u = c N_c s_c d_c + \gamma D_f N_q s_q d_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma s_\gamma d_\gamma}

  • Water Table Correction:

    • If water table above foundation base, use submerged unit weight (γ' = γ_sat - γ_w) for the term involving γ (N_γ term) and replace γ in N_q term with γ' if D_f is below WT.

    • γ_correction factor (d_γ): Applied to N_γ term based on depth of WT relative to B.

C. Numerical Problems Approach

  1. Identify soil type (c-φ, pure c, pure φ).

  2. Determine relevant bearing capacity factors (N_c, N_q, N_γ) from tables (Terzaghi or IS).

  3. Apply shape, depth, and water table correction factors.

  4. Calculate q_u, then q_net,u, q_net,s, q_all.

  5. For FOS against shear failure: \( FOS = \frac{q_{net,u}}{q_{net,applied}} \).

[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Forgetting to use γ' (submerged unit weight) when water table is at/below foundation base. Always check water table position relative to D_f and B.


III. SETTLEMENT OF FOUNDATIONS

A. Components of Total Settlement (S_total = S_i + S_c + S_s)

  • Immediate Settlement (S_i): Elastic distortion, occurs during/just after construction. Significant in sands & stiff clays.

  • Primary Consolidation Settlement (S_c): Pore water expulsion, time-dependent. Major component in saturated clays.

  • Secondary Consolidation Settlement (S_s): Creep of soil skeleton after primary consolidation. Important in organic/clayey soils.

B. Immediate Settlement Calculation

  • Equation (Cohesive soils, c-φ):

    \boxed{S_i = \frac{q B (1 - \mu^2) I_f}{E_s} \quad \text{(for strip footing)}}

    • q = net applied pressure

    • B = footing width

    • μ = Poisson's ratio

    • I_f = Influence factor (from table/chart based on L/B, φ)

    • E_s = Modulus of elasticity of soil (from lab/empirical correlations)

  • For Rectangular Footing: \( S_i = \frac{q B (1 - \mu^2)}{E_s} I_f \). I_f depends on L/B ratio.

  • Influence Factor (I_f): Tabulated (e.g., IS 8009-1:2016). Increases with footing size, decreases with depth.

C. Plate Load Test

  • Procedure: Load a rigid plate (usually 0.3 m²) at ground level, measure settlement. Load incrementally until failure/specified settlement.

  • Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u,plate): From load-settlement curve (e.g., where tangent slope = 0.5× initial slope, or sudden failure).

  • Settlement Extrapolation (Terzaghi & Peck):

    • Sand: \( S_{footing} \approx S_{plate} \times \frac{B_{footing}}{B_{plate}} \)

    • Clay: \( S_{footing} \approx S_{plate} \times \frac{B_{footing}}{B_{plate}} \) (for flexible footing on saturated clay).

D. Numerical Problems Approach

  1. For S_i: Identify E_s, μ, q, B, L/B → get I_f from table → compute S_i.

  2. For plate load: Use extrapolation formula based on soil type and footing flexibility.


IV. PILE FOUNDATIONS

A. Classification & Functions

  • By Material: Timber, Concrete, Steel, Composite.

  • By Function:

    • End-bearing Pile: Rest on hard stratum.

    • Friction Pile: Derive capacity from shaft friction.

    • Combined Pile: Both end-bearing & friction.

  • By Installation:

    • Driven: Precast, displacement (hammers).

    • Bored: Cast-in-situ, non-displacement (drilling).

    • Screw: Helical piles.

  • Functions: Transfer load, resist uplift, control settlement, stabilize slopes.

B. Load Carrying Capacity of Single Pile

  • Static Formulae:

    • Cohesive Soils (α-method): \( Q_{up} = \alpha c_u A_s + c_b A_b \)

      \boxed{Q_{up} = \alpha c_u (\pi d L) + c_b \left(\frac{\pi d^2}{4}\right)}

      • α = adhesion factor (0.5-1.0, decreases with depth/sensitivity)

      • c_u = undrained shear strength

      • A_s = shaft area, A_b = base area

      • c_b = base adhesion (≈ 9c_u for bored, 6c_u for driven in soft clay)

    • Cohesionless Soils (β-method): \( Q_{up} = \beta \sigma'_{v0} A_s + q_b A_b \)

      \boxed{Q_{up} = \beta K \sigma'_{v0} (\pi d L) + \gamma D_f N_q \left(\frac{\pi d^2}{4}\right)}

      • β = skin friction factor (≈ K tanδ, K = lateral earth pressure coeff, δ = friction angle)

      • σ'_{v0} = avg vertical effective stress along shaft

      • q_b = bearing pressure at pile tip (≈ σ'_{v0} N_q)

  • Dynamic Formulae (Drop Hammer):

    • Energy Principle: \( \text{Energy input} = \text{Work done} + \text{Losses} \)

    • Drop Hammer Formula (Engineering News Record):

      \boxed{Q_{safe} = \frac{W h}{S + C} \times \frac{W + n P}{W} \times \frac{1}{FOS}}

      • W = hammer weight, h = fall, S = final set (penetration per blow), C = constant (25 mm for drop hammer, 2.5 mm for steam hammer), n = coefficient (1 for single-acting, 2 for double-acting), P = ram weight.
    • Pile Set: Total elastic + plastic compression.

  • Capacity from SPT/CPT:

    • Sand: \( q_b = N_q \sigma'_{v0} \), \( f_s = K \sigma'_{v0} \tan\delta \) (K from SPT N-value correlations).

    • Clay: \( q_b = 9 c_u \), \( f_s = \alpha c_u \) (α from SPT N-value or CPT sleeve friction).

C. Pile Group Capacity & Settlement

  • Group Efficiency (η): \( \eta = \frac{Q_{ug}}{n Q_{us}} \). η < 1 for soft clays (due to overlapping stress zones), η ≈ 1 for dense sand/rock.

  • Group Settlement Ratio (GSR): \( GSR = \frac{S_g}{n S_s} \). GSR > 1 for clays (group settlement > sum of single pile settlements).

  • Ultimate Capacity of Pile Group:

    • Block Failure (cohesive soils, close spacing): Treat group as a single large foundation.

      \( Q_{ug} = c N_c (B_g L_g) + \gamma D_f N_q (B_g L_g) + 0.5 \gamma B_g N_\gamma (B_g L_g) \)

    • Individual Failure (spacing > 3-4d): \( Q_{ug} = \eta \times n \times Q_{us} \)

  • Pile Group Settlement: Usually governs design. Can be estimated from settlement of equivalent raft at depth of pile cap.

D. Special Topics

  • Negative Skin Friction (NSF):

    • Concept: Downward drag on pile due to settlement of compressible soil around it (e.g., fill, soft clay, lowering WT).

    • Calculation for Single Pile:

      \boxed{Q_{nsf} = \gamma_{fill} \cdot K \cdot \tan\delta \cdot (A_s){drag} \quad \text{or} \quad Q{nsf} = \bar{c}u \cdot (A_s){drag}}

      • (A_s)_{drag} = area of pile in settling layer.

      • δ = interface friction angle (≈ φ for sand, 3/4 φ for clay-fill).

    • For Pile Group: Consider group as a block; NSF acts on block perimeter.

  • Under-reamed Piles:

    • Concept: Pile with bulbs (under-reams) at intervals. Provides tensile capacity & swell pressure resistance in expansive soils.

    • Components: Shaft, under-ream bulb (diameter 2-3× shaft), collar (to prevent soil intrusion).

    • Suitability: Expansive soils (black cotton soil), collapsible soils, loose sands.

    • Ultimate Tensile Capacity:

      \boxed{T_u = \sum (A_b \cdot q_b) + \sum (A_s \cdot f_s)}

      • q_b = bearing capacity of bulb base (≈ 9c_u for clay).

      • f_s = shaft friction (αc_u).

E. Numerical Problems Approach

  1. Single Pile (Cohesive): Compute Q_s (αc_uA_s) and Q_b (c_bA_b or 9c_uA_b). Sum = Q_ult. Safe load = Q_ult / FOS.

  2. Single Pile (Cohesionless): Compute Q_s (βKσ'v0A_s) and Q_b (q_bA_b). Use β from table or β = K tanδ.

  3. Pile Group (Neglect End Bearing): \( Q_{ug} = \eta \times n \times (\alpha c_u A_s) \) or use block failure if spacing very close (<3d).

  4. Negative Skin Friction: Identify drag layer, compute average effective stress/c_u, calculate f_drag, multiply by affected surface area.

  5. Under-reamed Pile Tensile Capacity: Calculate capacity of each bulb (base + shaft above/below bulb) and sum.


V. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE & RETAINING STRUCTURES

A. Types & Fundamentals

  • At Rest (K₀): Wall rigid, no movement. \( K_0 = 1 - \sin\phi' \) (Jaky's formula for normally consolidated cohesionless soil).

  • Active (K_a): Wall moves away from soil. Minimum lateral pressure.

  • Passive (K_p): Wall pushed into soil. Maximum lateral pressure.

  • Relationship: \( K_a = \frac{1}{K_p} \) for φ > 0°.

B. Rankine's Earth Pressure Theory (1875)

  • Assumptions: Wall smooth & vertical, backfill horizontal, cohesionless (c=0) or homogeneous c-φ soil, failure surface planar.

  • Coefficients:

    • Cohesionless: \( K_a = \tan^2(45° - \phi/2) \), \( K_p = \tan^2(45° + \phi/2) \)

    • Cohesive (c>0): \( \sigma_a = K_a \gamma z - 2c \sqrt{K_a} \) (tension crack depth \( z_c = \frac{2c}{\gamma \sqrt{K_a}} \))

  • Pressure Distribution:

    • Horizontal Backfill: Linear for c-φ, triangular for φ>0, trapezoidal for c>0 (tension zone at top).

    • Sloping Backfill (β): \( K_a(\beta) = \frac{\cos\beta \sqrt{1+\sin\phi'\cos^2\beta}}{1-\sqrt{\sin\phi'\sin(\phi'-\beta)}} \) (complex). Pressure not linear.

    • Sloping Wall: Use β = wall inclination.

C. Coulomb's Earth Pressure Theory (1776)

  • Assumptions: Wall rough (δ = wall friction), planar failure surface through toe, backfill dry/cohesionless, wedge in equilibrium.

  • Active Thrust (P_a):

    \boxed{P_a = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a \quad \text{(for horizontal backfill, vertical wall)}}

    • \( K_a = \frac{\cos^2(\phi' - \delta)}{2\cos^2\delta \cos(\delta + \beta) \left[1 + \sqrt{\frac{\sin(\phi' + \delta)\sin(\phi' - \beta)}{\cos\delta\cos(\beta - \delta)}}\right]^2} \)

    • Point of Application: From base, \( \bar{z} = \frac{H}{3} \) (for horizontal backfill, vertical wall, δ=0).

  • Culmann's Graphical Method:

    • Used for non-horizontal backfill or sloping wall with Coulomb.

    • Draw failure planes at various angles, compute weight of wedge & corresponding thrust. Envelope gives maximum P_a and its angle.

D. Comparison & Application

Feature Rankine's Coulomb's
Wall Friction (δ) 0 (smooth) Considered (rough)
Failure Surface Planar (inclined at 45+φ/2) Planar (variable angle)
Backfill Horizontal only Any slope (via Culmann)
K_a Value Higher (more conservative) Lower (more realistic for rough walls)
Simplicity Simple formulas Complex, often graphical
  • Numerical Problems Steps:

    1. Draw cross-section, identify soil layers, water table, surcharge.

    2. Compute effective unit weights below WT.

    3. Determine K (Rankine/Coulomb) for each layer.

    4. Calculate pressure at layer interfaces.

    5. Draw pressure diagram (triangular/trapezoidal/compounded).

    6. Integrate to get total thrust (P) and point of application (from base).

      • For triangular: \( P = \frac{1}{2} \sigma_{base} H \), \( \bar{z} = H/3 \).

      • For trapezoidal: \( P = \frac{1}{2}(\sigma_{top} + \sigma_{base})H \), \( \bar{z} = \frac{H(2\sigma_{base} + \sigma_{top})}{3(\sigma_{top} + \sigma_{base})} \).

E. Retaining Walls

  • Sheet Pile vs. Retaining Wall:

    | Sheet Pile | Retaining Wall | | :--- | :--- | | Thin, embedded section | Massive, gravity/ cantilever | | Used for temporary cofferdams, shoring | Permanent structures | | Resists lateral pressure by soil-structure interaction (flexure) | Resists by self-weight & base friction | | Uses: Excavation support, waterfront structures | Uses: Highway cuts, bridge abutments, basement walls |

  • Modes of Failure:

    1. Overturning: Moment about toe > resisting moment. Check FOS > 1.5.

    2. Sliding: Horizontal thrust > friction + cohesion at base. \( FOS = \frac{\mu W + c_b B}{P_a} > 1.5 \).

    3. Bearing Capacity Failure: Excessive pressure under toe. Check q_max < q_all.

    4. Deep-seated failure: Global slope failure.

  • Earth Pressure with Tension Cracks: In cohesive backfills (c>0), active pressure at top may be tensile → crack develops until pressure = 0. Depth of crack \( z_c = \frac{2c}{\gamma \sqrt{K_a}} \). Pressure diagram starts from z_c.


VI. SPECIAL SOILS & GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES

A. Problematic Soils

  • Expansive Soils (e.g., Black Cotton Soil):

    • Characteristics: High montmorillonite clay, high shrink-swell potential, low bearing capacity when wet, high when dry.

    • Problems: Differential heave/shrinkage, cracking in foundations/floors, seasonal damage.

    • Preventive Measures: Moisture control (watering, barriers), under-reamed piles, chemical stabilization (lime), replacement, raft foundations.

  • Collapsible Soils (e.g., Loess):

    • Characteristics: Metastable, loose, cemented (carbonate/salt), low moisture content. Sudden collapse upon wetting.

    • Problems: Sudden settlement, differential collapse.

    • Preventive Measures: Pre-wetting, deep foundations (piles), compaction, chemical stabilization.

B. Soil Stabilization

  • Need: Improve strength, reduce swell/shrink, increase durability.

  • Mechanical: Compaction (increases density), Reinforcement (geosynthetics).

  • Chemical:

    • Lime: Best for high-plasticity clays. Reduces plasticity, increases strength via pozzolanic reactions.

    • Cement: For sandy/silty soils. Increases strength, reduces permeability.

    • Bitumen: For waterproofing, base courses.

  • Electrical (Electro-osmosis): Apply DC current to move water from anode to cathode in fine-grained soils. Used for dewatering/slope stability.

C. Geosynthetics

Type Function(s) Primary Use
Geotextile (Woven/Non-woven) Separation, Filtration, Reinforcement, Drainage Separation (soft/hard layers), drainage, erosion control
Geogrid Reinforcement High-strength reinforcement in soil/aggregates
Geomembrane Containment, Barrier Landfill liners, ponds, waterproofing
Geocomposite (e.g., Geonet) Drainage High-flow drainage planes
  • Functions in Detail:

    • Separation: Prevent mixing of dissimilar soils.

    • Reinforcement: Tensile strength to resist loads.

    • Filtration: Allow water flow but retain soil particles.

    • Drainage: In-plane flow of water/leachate.

    • Erosion Control: Protect slopes from runoff.

    • Containment: Barrier to fluids/gases.

D. Compaction

  • Field Equipment:

    • Smooth Wheel: Granular soils, finishing.

    • Sheepsfoot: Cohesive soils, deep compaction.

    • Pneumatic: Granular & cohesive, uniform pressure.

    • Vibratory: Granular soils, high density.

  • Lab Compaction Tests:

    | Standard Proctor (Light) | Modified Proctor (Heavy) | | :--- | :--- | | Hammer: 2.5 kg, Fall: 300 mm | Hammer: 4.5 kg, Fall: 450 mm | | Layers: 3, Blows: 25 | Layers: 5, Blows: 25 | | Compaction Effort: ~600 kN-m/m³ | Compaction Effort: ~2700 kN-m/m³ | | OMC: Higher | OMC: Lower | | MDD: Lower | MDD: Higher |


VII. MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION TYPES & CONCEPTS

A. Shallow Foundations

  • Types:

    • Spread/Isolated Footing: Under single column.

    • Combined Footing: Under 2+ columns.

    • Strap Footing: Connects isolated footing to column with strap beam.

    • Raft/Mat Foundation: Single thick slab under entire structure. Used when q_all is low or loads heavy.

    • Floating Foundation: Raft designed so net increase in vertical stress = 0 (excavated soil weight = structure weight). For very soft clays.

  • Proportioning of Raft Foundations: Thickness based on shear & punching shear; reinforcement for flexure. Check bearing pressure uniformity.

  • Basic Criteria for Satisfactory Performance: Adequate bearing capacity, total & differential settlement within limits, structural integrity.

B. Well Foundations

  • Components (with sketch):

    1. Well Curb: Bottom cutting edge, concrete/steel.

    2. Well Steining: Vertical masonry/concrete above curb, tapers outward.

    3. Cutting Edge: Steel angle at bottom for sinking.

    4. Apron: Platform around top to prevent soil erosion.

    5. Well Sinking: Process of excavating inside to sink well.

  • Uses: Bridges, piers, abutments in sandy soils/rivers.

  • Limitations: Slow, difficult in rocky soils, requires skilled labor.

C. Modes of Shear Failure in Soils

  • General Shear Failure: Dense sand/stiff clay. Failure surface extends to surface. Sudden, large settlements, well-defined failure wedge. Influenced by: Foundation depth/width ratio (D_f/B), soil compressibility (low).

  • Local Shear Failure: Medium-dense sand/medium clay. Failure surface does not reach surface. Progressive, moderate settlements. Influenced by: Moderate D_f/B, moderate compressibility.

  • Punching Shear Failure: Loose sand/soft clay. Failure surface confined under footing. Very small settlements, no heave. Influenced by: Low D_f/B, high compressibility.

    Sketch Required: Show failure surfaces for each mode relative to footing.


KEY FORMULAS & DEFINITIONS BOXED FOR EXAM

  • SPT N-value Corrections:

    \( N_{60} = N_{field} \times \frac{ER_{field}}{60\%} \)

  • Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity (Strip):

    \( q_u = c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma \)

  • IS Code Bearing Capacity:

    \( q_u = c N_c s_c d_c + \gamma D_f N_q s_q d_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma s_\gamma d_\gamma \)

  • Immediate Settlement (c-φ):

    \( S_i = \frac{q B (1 - \mu^2) I_f}{E_s} \)

  • Single Pile Capacity (Cohesive - α-method):

    \( Q_{up} = \alpha c_u (\pi d L) + c_b \left(\frac{\pi d^2}{4}\right) \)

  • Drop Hammer Safe Load:

    \( Q_{safe} = \frac{W h}{S + C} \times \frac{W + n P}{W} \times \frac{1}{FOS} \)

  • Negative Skin Friction (Single Pile):

    \( Q_{nsf} = \gamma_{fill} \cdot K \cdot \tan\delta \cdot (A_s)_{drag} \)

  • Rankine Active Pressure (Cohesive):

    \( \sigma_a = K_a \gamma z - 2c \sqrt{K_a} \)

  • Coulomb Active Thrust (Horizontal Backfill):

    \( P_a = \frac{1}{2} \gamma H^2 K_a \)

Critical Definitions to Remember:

  • Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_net,u): \( q_u - \gamma D_f \)

  • Allowable Bearing Pressure (q_all): \( q_{net,s} + \gamma D_f \)

  • Group Efficiency (η): \( \frac{Q_{ug}}{n Q_{us}} \)

  • At Rest Earth Pressure Coefficient (K₀): \( 1 - \sin\phi' \) (Jaky's)

Go to where you left off?

Quick Add to Notes

Save questions, your own notes and screenshots into notes filed by unit. It takes a free account.

Create free account

Have an account? Log in