Skip to content
CE-802 (B) · Foundation Engineering/Quick Revision Short Notes

Foundation Engineering (CE-802 (B)) - Unit 5 Short Notes

1.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION & SAMPLING

1.1 Methods of Boring/Hole Advancement

  • Percussion Boring: Repeated lifting and dropping of a heavy chisel to break rock/soil. Uses shell & auger to remove cuttings. Suitable for boulders/rock.

  • Rotary Drilling: Most versatile & widely used. A rotating drill bit (diamond, tungsten carbide) cuts soil/rock. Circulates drilling fluid (bentonite mud) to cool bit, carry cuttings, and stabilize borehole walls.

    [!TIP] Advantages over percussion: Faster in soft soils & rock, produces undisturbed samples (with core barrel), better control in loose sands/water-bearing strata.

  • Wash Boring: Jet of water softens soil; chopping bit breaks it; water carries cuttings to surface. Quick but highly disturbs granular soils.

  • Auger Boring: Hand/machine-driven helical auger. Good for shallow depths in cohesive soils. Disturbed samples only.

1.2 In-Situ Testing

1.2.1 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
  • Procedure: Drive a split spoon sampler (50.8 mm ID, 63.5 mm OD) into soil at borehole bottom by a 63.5 kg hammer falling 760 mm. Record blows for each 150 mm penetration. N-value = blows for last 300 mm (discard first 150 mm as seating).

  • Equipment: Donut hammer, tripod, drilling rig, sampler, liners.

  • Corrections to N-value (Critical for Design):

    1. Overburden Pressure Correction (N₁): $$\displaystyle N_1 = N \times \frac{\bar{\sigma}_v'}{P_a} $$ where $$\displaystyle \bar{\sigma}_v' $$ = avg. effective overburden pressure (kPa) at test depth, $$\displaystyle P_a = 100 $$ kPa. For $$\displaystyle \phi > 5° $$, use $$\displaystyle N_2 = N_1 \times \left( \frac{P_a}{\bar{\sigma}_v'} \right)^{0.5} $$.

    2. Dilatancy Correction (N₂): For dense saturated fine sands/silts (N > 15). $$\displaystyle N_2 = N_1 \times \frac{2}{1 + \frac{N_1 \sigma'_v}{P_a}} $$.

    3. Energy Correction (N₆₀): Corrects to 60% standard energy. $$\displaystyle N_{60} = N_{obs} \times \frac{E_R}{60} $$ where $$\displaystyle E_R $$ = measured energy ratio (%). Standard is 60%.

    4. Rod Length Correction: For rod length < 6m, energy transfer reduces.

    [!TIP] Final Corrected N-value: Apply in order: Rod length → N₁ (overburden) → N₂ (dilatancy) → N₆₀ (energy). N₆₀ is most commonly used for liquefaction/empirical correlations.

  • Significance: Index of relative density/consistency, estimate of φ, c, modulus, liquefaction potential.

  • Limitations: Disturbs granular soils, not suitable for very soft clays, results variable.

1.2.2 Cone Penetration Test (CPT) & Seismic CPT (SCPT)
  • Procedure: Push a standard cone (10 cm² area, 60° apex) into soil at 20 mm/s. Measure tip resistance (q_c) and sleeve friction (f_s) continuously. u₂ measures pore pressure.

  • SCPT: Adds a seismic sensor to measure shear wave velocity (V_s) for small-strain stiffness.

  • Comparison SPT vs. CPT:

    | Feature | SPT | CPT | |-------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------| | Disruption | High (chopping action) | Low (continuous push) | | Continuity | Discrete (every 1.5m) | Continuous profile | | Outputs | Single N-value | q_c, f_s, u₂, V_s (SCPT) | | In Sands | Better density estimate | Better friction estimate | | Soft Clays | Poor (sample disturbance) | Excellent |

1.2.3 Geophysical Methods
  • Seismic Refraction: Measures travel time of compressional waves (P-waves) to determine layer thickness & depth to bedrock from velocity contrasts.

  • Electrical Resistivity: Measures soil resistivity to detect stratification, groundwater, voids. Wenner & Schlumberger arrays common.

1.3 Soil Sampling

1.3.1 Disturbed vs. Undisturbed Samples
  • Disturbed: Structure altered. Used for classification tests (sieve, hydrometer, Atterberg limits, compaction).

  • Undisturbed: Structure & moisture preserved. Used for strength & consolidation tests (triaxial, oedometer). Quality assessed by sample recovery ratio and visual inspection (no smearing, distortion).

1.3.2 Sampler Design Parameters

For a thin-wall tube sampler (diameter D, wall thickness t):

  • Inside Clearance (C_i): $$\displaystyle (D_i - D_s)/D_s \times 100\% $$. Allows sample to expand into sampler (reduces friction). Optimal: 0.5-3%.

  • Outside Clearance (C_o): $$\displaystyle (D_s - D_o)/D_o \times 100\% $$. Reduces drag on sample exterior. Optimal: 0-2%.

  • Area Ratio (A_r): $$\displaystyle (D_s^2 - D_i^2)/(D_i^2) \times 100\% $$. Measures cutting edge sharpness. A_r < 10% for undisturbed.

    [!TIP] Sample Disturbance: High Area Ratio (>13%) causes significant disturbance. Low Inside Clearance (<0.5%) causes "suction" and sample expansion.

1.3.3 CNS Layer (Constant Normal Stress)

Concept in sampling: During driving, soil sample inside sampler experiences constant radial stress equal to in-situ lateral stress if C_i ≈ C_o. Minimizes disturbance.

1.4 Bore-log & Reporting

  • Components: Borehole ID, location, depth, water table, soil description (USCS/IS classification), stratification (depth, thickness), sample type & depth, N-value, lab test results, groundwater level.

  • IS Code Criteria (IS 1892:2016):

    • Depth: At least equal to width of foundation or 1.5 × width for clay, 2 × width for sand. Must penetrate weak layer to firm stratum.

    • Spacing: 15-30m for regular sites, closer for variable strata. Minimum 3 boreholes for small sites.


2.0 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS - BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT

2.1 Fundamental Definitions

  • Gross/Total Pressure (q): Load/area including weight of foundation & overburden.

  • Net Pressure (q_net): $$\displaystyle q_{net} = q - \gamma D_f $$ (excludes overburden).

  • Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u): Gross pressure causing shear failure.

  • Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_nu): $$\displaystyle q_{nu} = q_u - \gamma D_f $$.

  • Net Safe Bearing Capacity (q_ns): $$\displaystyle q_{ns} = q_{nu} / FOS $$.

  • Allowable Bearing Pressure (q_a): Pressure used for design (includes settlement criteria). Usually $$\displaystyle q_a \leq q_{ns} $$.

2.2 Bearing Capacity Theories

2.2.1 Terzaghi's Theory (1943)
  • Assumptions: Strip footing, rough base, φ > 0°, failure surface as log spiral + linear rays, $c-\phi$ soil, $$\displaystyle D_f/B \leq B $$, ground surface horizontal.

  • Equations:

    • Strip: $$\displaystyle q_u = c'N_c + q N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma $$

    • Square: $$\displaystyle q_u = 1.3 c'N_c + q N_q + 0.4 \gamma B N_\gamma $$

    • Circular: $$\displaystyle q_u = 1.3 c'N_c + q N_q + 0.3 \gamma B N_\gamma $$

    • Where $$\displaystyle q = \gamma D_f $$, $$\displaystyle N_c, N_q, N_\gamma $$ = bearing capacity factors (function of φ').

2.2.2 IS Method (BIS Code 6403:1981)
  • General Equation: $$\displaystyle q_u = c' N_c r_c + q N_q r_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma r_\gamma $$

  • Correction Factors:

    • Shape Factors (r_c, r_q, r_γ): For rectangular footing: $$\displaystyle r_c = 1 + 0.2 \frac{B}{L} $$, $$\displaystyle r_q = 1 + 0.1 \frac{B}{L} $$, $$\displaystyle r_γ = 1 - 0.3 \frac{B}{L} $$.

    • Depth Factor (r_q, r_γ): For $$\displaystyle D_f/B \leq 1 $$: $$\displaystyle r_q = 1 + 0.1 \frac{B}{L} \frac{D_f}{B} $$, $$\displaystyle r_γ = 1 - 0.3 \frac{B}{L} \frac{D_f}{B} $$.

    • Ground Water Table Factor (r_w): If water table at/base: $$\displaystyle r_w = 1 $$; if at surface: $$\displaystyle r_w = 0.5 $$; intermediate: linear interpolation based on submerged unit weight above WT.

2.3 Bearing Capacity Calculations

  • For Cohesive Soils (φ=0°): $$\displaystyle N_c = 5.7 $$ (Terzaghi), $$\displaystyle N_q = 1 $$, $$\displaystyle N_γ = 0 $$. $$\displaystyle q_u = c_u N_c + \gamma D_f $$.

  • For Cohesionless Soils (c=0°): $$\displaystyle q_u = q N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_γ $$. Water table correction critical: Use submerged unit weight (γ') for layer below WT, apply $$\displaystyle r_w $$ factor.

  • Factor of Safety: Applied to net ultimate capacity ($$\displaystyle q_{ns} = q_{nu}/FOS $$) for cohesive soils. For cohesionless, FOS on gross q_u is common due to settlement control.

  • Water Table Cases:

    1. Far below base: Use γ (total).

    2. At ground level: Use γ' (submerged) + hydrostatic pressure (separate term).

    3. Intermediate: Calculate effective vertical stress at base level (γ' above WT, γ below).

2.4 Settlement of Shallow Foundations

2.4.1 Components of Total Settlement (S_total)
  1. Immediate (Elastic) Settlement (S_i): Due to shear strain, occurs instantaneously in saturated clays (undrained) & granular soils.

  2. Primary Consolidation Settlement (S_c): Due to expulsion of pore water from saturated clays, time-dependent.

  3. Secondary Consolidation (S_s): Due to plastic adjustment of soil skeleton after primary consolidation, very slow.

2.4.2 Immediate Settlement Calculation

For cohesive soils (φ≈0°):

$$S_i = \frac{q B (1 - \nu^2)}{E_s} I_f$$

  • $q$ = net pressure.

  • $B$ = footing width.

  • $\nu$ = Poisson's ratio (0.5 for undrained clay).

  • $$\displaystyle E_s $$ = Secant modulus at relevant stress level (from lab oedometer/consolidated undrained triaxial).

  • $$\displaystyle I_f $$ = Influence factor (from charts/tables, e.g., 1.06 for 1.6m×1.6m footing at 0.8m depth, ν=0.25).

[!TIP] Key: Use E_s at working stress, not E_50 or E_100. For sands, use E_s from correlation with N-value.

2.4.3 Plate Load Test & Scaling
  • Test: Load a rigid plate (0.3m sq.) incrementally, measure settlement. Plot load-settlement curve.

  • Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u,plate): From curve (e.g., settlement = 0.1B or plunging).

  • Scaling to Footing (Terzaghi & Peck):

    • For Cohesive Soils: $$\displaystyle q_{u,footing} \approx q_{u,plate} $$ (size effect negligible).

    • For Cohesionless Soils: $$\displaystyle S_{footing} = S_{plate} \times \frac{B_{footing}}{B_{plate}} $$ (settlement proportional to width).

    • For Bearing Capacity: $$\displaystyle q_{u,footing} = q_{u,plate} \times \frac{B_{footing}}{B_{plate}} $$ (for sands, capacity ∝ B).

2.5 Types & Proportioning of Shallow Foundations

  • Types: Isolated, Combined, Strap, Mat/Raft.

  • Floating Foundation: Raft foundation where weight of structure + raft = weight of soil excavated. Net increase in vertical stress ≈ 0. Minimizes settlement.

  • Raft Proportioning: Thickness ($t$) designed for shear & bending. For flat slab: $$\displaystyle t \geq \frac{B}{6} $$ (simplified). Must satisfy FOS > 1.5 against shear.

  • Satisfactory Performance Criteria: Adequate bearing capacity, ** tolerable settlement** (uniform & total), stability (no tilting).


3.0 PILE FOUNDATIONS

3.1 Classification & Functions

  • By Function: End-bearing, Friction, Combined.

  • By Material: Timber, Concrete, Steel, Composite.

  • By Installation: Driven (displacement), Bored (non-displacement), Screw, Under-reamed.

3.2 Load Carrying Capacity of Single Pile

3.2.1 Static Formulas
  • Cohesive Soils (α-method): $$\displaystyle Q_u = \alpha c_u A_s + q_b A_b $$

    • $\alpha$ = adhesion factor (0.5-1.0, decreases with L/D).

    • $$\displaystyle c_u $$ = average undrained cohesion along shaft.

    • $$\displaystyle A_s $$ = shaft area, $$\displaystyle A_b $$ = base area, $$\displaystyle q_b = N_c c_u $$ (usually $$\displaystyle N_c=9 $$).

  • Cohesionless Soils (β/K_p method): $$\displaystyle Q_u = \gamma D_f A_s K_p \tan \delta + q_b A_b $$

    • $\beta$ or $$\displaystyle K_p \tan \delta $$ = friction factor (0.3-0.6 for sands).

    • $\delta$ = interface friction angle (≈ 0.75φ for concrete-sand).

    • $$\displaystyle q_b = \sigma'_{vb} N_q $$ (effective vertical stress at base × bearing capacity factor).

3.2.2 Dynamic Formulas
  • ENR Formula (Drop Hammer):

$$Q_{all} = \frac{W h}{s + c} \times \frac{W + n W_p}{W + W_p} \times \frac{1}{FOS}$$

*   $W$ = hammer weight, $h$ = fall, $s$ = final set (penetration per blow, cm), $c$ = sum of elastic compressions (cm), $$\displaystyle W_p $$ = pile weight, $n$ = coefficient of restitution (0.3-0.5).

> [!TIP] **Elastic Compression (c):** $$\displaystyle c = \frac{P L}{A E} $$ (P = estimated load, L = length, A = area, E = modulus). **Iterative solution** often required.
3.2.3 SPT/CPT Correlations
  • For Sands: $$\displaystyle q_b = 4 N_{60} \frac{B}{D} $$ (kPa) for driven piles (empirical).

  • For Clays: $$\displaystyle Q_s = \alpha c_u A_s $$, where $\alpha$ correlated with $$\displaystyle c_u $$ or $$\displaystyle N_{60} $$.

3.3 Pile Groups

3.3.1 Group Efficiency & Failure Patterns
  • Efficiency (η): $$\displaystyle η = \frac{Q_{ug}}{n Q_{us}} $$

    • Cohesive soils: η < 1 (block failure possible, group capacity < sum of individuals).

    • Cohesionless soils: η ≈ 1 (group capacity ≈ sum).

  • Failure Patterns:

    • Individual Failure: Piles fail separately (large spacing, S > 6D).

    • Block Failure: Soil moves as a single block (small spacing, S < 3D in clays).

3.3.2 Capacity Calculation of Pile Groups
  • For Cohesive Soils (Block Failure Possible):

$$Q_{ug} = \min \begin{cases} n \times Q_{us} \\ c' \times (B_g L_g) + \alpha \bar{c}_u \times (perimeter \times L) \end{cases}$$

*   $$\displaystyle B_g, L_g $$ = group footprint dimensions.

*   $$\displaystyle \bar{c}_u $$ = average cohesion along group perimeter.

*   **Adhesion factor (α) for group perimeter** often < 1.
  • For Cohesionless Soils: $$\displaystyle Q_{ug} = n \times Q_{us} $$ (usually).

    [!TIP] Common Exam Problem: Given pile diameter, length, spacing, soil c, adhesion factor. Check block failure by calculating block area & perimeter capacity. Compare with n×Q_us.

3.3.3 Geometrical Properties
  • Group Shape: Square, rectangular, circular.

  • Arrangement: Square, triangular, rectangular.

  • Spacing (S): Minimum 3D (clay) to 4-6D (sand) to avoid group capacity reduction.

3.4 Negative Skin Friction (NSF)

  • Definition: Downward drag force on pile due to downward movement of surrounding soil relative to pile.

  • Causes: Soft compressible soil (clay, fill), surcharge (new fill), lowering water table (causes consolidation).

  • Calculation for Single Pile:

$$Q_{nsf} = \alpha \cdot \bar{\sigma}_v' \cdot A_s \quad \text{or} \quad Q_{nsf} = \gamma \cdot \Delta H \cdot A_s$$

*   $\alpha$ = adhesion factor for soft clay (0.3-0.5).

*   $$\displaystyle \bar{\sigma}_v' $$ = **effective vertical stress** at mid-depth of compressible layer.

*   $\Delta H$ = settlement of soil layer (from consolidation).

> [!TIP] **NSF acts as additional load** on pile. **Net capacity = Q_u - Q_nsf**.

3.5 Under-reamed Piles

  • Concept: Single/double under-reamed bulbs (enlarged base) on a bored pile. Provides tensile & uplift resistance.

  • Construction: Bored manually/machine, under-reamed using special tool, cast in-situ.

  • Suitability: Expansive soils (counteract swelling pressure), lifting forces (towers, bridges), collapsible soils.

  • Ultimate Tensile Capacity (Neglecting suction & adhesion):

$$Q_{tu} = q_b \times A_b + \alpha \bar{c}_u \times (shaft area below bulb)$$

*   $$\displaystyle q_b = 9 c_u $$ (for bulb in stiff clay).

*   **Bulb diameter** typically 2.5-3× shaft diameter.

*   **Adhesion on shaft below bulb** may be neglected if smooth.

4.0 EARTH PRESSURE & RETAINING STRUCTURES

4.1 Types of Lateral Earth Pressure

  • At Rest (K₀): Wall immovable, soil never yielded. $$\displaystyle K_0 = 1 - \sin \phi' $$ (for normally consolidated clays).

  • Active (Kₐ): Wall moves away from soil, soil expands, minimum pressure. $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K_a \sigma_v' - 2c' \sqrt{K_a} $$.

  • Passive (Kₚ): Wall moves into soil, soil compressed, maximum pressure. $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K_p \sigma_v' + 2c' \sqrt{K_p} $$.

4.2 Earth Pressure Theories

4.2.1 Rankine's Theory (1875)
  • Assumptions: Semi-infinite soil mass, wall friction δ=0, horizontal backfill, vertical wall, cohesionless or cohesive with vertical rupture plane.

  • For Cohesionless (c'=0): $$\displaystyle K_a = \tan^2(45° - \phi'/2) $$, $$\displaystyle K_p = \tan^2(45° + \phi'/2) $$.

  • For Cohesive (c'>0): $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = K_a \sigma_v' - 2c' \sqrt{K_a} $$ (tension crack depth $$\displaystyle z_c = \frac{2c'}{\gamma \sqrt{K_a}} $$).

  • With Water Table: Use submerged unit weight below WT, add hydrostatic pressure separately.

4.2.2 Coulomb's Theory (1776)
  • Assumptions: Plane rupture surface, wall friction δ considered, inclined backfill β possible.

  • Wedge Analysis: Consider limiting equilibrium of soil wedge sliding on plane at angle α.

  • Expression for Kₐ (simplified, δ=0): Same as Rankine. With δ>0, $$\displaystyle K_a $$ increases.

  • Effect of Wall Friction (δ): $$\displaystyle K_a $$ reduces as δ increases (for given φ'). Actual δ depends on wall material (smooth concrete: δ≈φ/2, rough: δ≈2φ/3).

4.2.3 Comparison: Rankine vs. Coulomb
Aspect Rankine Coulomb
Wall Friction Neglected (δ=0) Considered (δ)
Backfill Horizontal only Inclined (β) allowed
Rupture Surface Vertical (c>0) / curved (c=0) Plane (assumed)
Kₐ for δ>0 Overestimates (unsafe) More realistic
Complexity Simple equations Requires trial wedge angle
4.2.4 Culmann's Graphical Method
  • Used for active pressure with sloping, broken, or surcharged backfill.

  • Construction:

    1. Plot weight triangle OW (soil wedge weights for various α).

    2. From W, draw friction lines at angle δ to radial lines.

    3. From O, draw pressure lines parallel to wall.

    4. Envelope of intersection points gives active pressure diagram.

    5. Resultant (Pₐ) = max ordinate on envelope, acts at centroid of pressure diagram.

4.3 Earth Pressure Calculations (Problem-Based)

  • Dry Cohesionless: $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = K_a \gamma z $$.

  • Submerged/Saturated: Use γ' below WT, add u = γ_w (z - z_w) separately. Total = $$\displaystyle K_a \gamma' z + \gamma_w (z - z_w) $$.

  • Cohesive Backfill (c'>0): $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = K_a \gamma z - 2c' \sqrt{K_a} $$ (until tension crack depth). Beyond that, $$\displaystyle \sigma_a = K_a \gamma z $$.

  • With Surcharge (q): Add $$\displaystyle K_a q $$ uniformly to pressure diagram.

  • Stratified Backfill: Calculate Kₐ for each layer using its φ'. Pressure at interface = pressure from top layer + $$\displaystyle K_a \gamma_{layer} \times thickness $$. Diagram piecewise linear.

4.4 Retaining Wall Design & Analysis

  • Total Active Thrust (Pₐ):

    • Simple case (c=0, horizontal backfill): $$\displaystyle P_a = \frac{1}{2} K_a \gamma H^2 $$ (per unit length).

    • Point of Application: From base, H/3 for triangular diagram.

  • Pressure Distribution at Base:

    • Active case: Linear (c=0) or non-linear (c>0, with tension crack).

    • With water: Add hydrostatic wedge.

  • Modes of Failure:

    1. Overturning: Moment due to lateral thrust > resisting moment (due to weight). FOS = Resisting Moment / Overturning Moment ≥ 1.5.

    2. Sliding: $$\displaystyle P_a > \mu W $$ (μ = coefficient of friction, often 0.5-0.7). FOS = (μW + P_p) / P_a ≥ 1.5 (include passive if key).

    3. Bearing Capacity Failure: Eccentric loading on base. Check e ≤ B/6 for uniform pressure. Max pressure $$\displaystyle q_{max} = \frac{W}{B} \left(1 + \frac{6e}{B}\right) \leq q_{allow} $$.

  • Design Checks: All three FOS must satisfy code limits.

4.5 Sheet Piles

  • Differentiation: Sheet piles are interlocking vertical elements (steel, wood, concrete) driven to form continuous wall for cofferdams, bulkheads, excavation support. Retaining walls are massive, free-standing structures (gravity, cantilever).

  • Uses: Temporary/permanent ** excavation support**, seawalls, riverbank protection, containment.


5.0 SOIL IMPROVEMENT & PROBLEMATIC SOILS

5.1 Geosynthetics

5.1.1 Types & Functions
Type Structure Primary Functions
Geotextiles Woven (high strength) / Non-woven (filtration) Separation, Filtration, Reinforcement, Drainage, Protection
Geogrids Grid-like (tensile strength) Reinforcement (road subgrade, slopes)
Geomats 3D mat (thick) Erosion control (immediate vegetation)
Geocells 3D honeycomb (filled with soil) Reinforcement & confinement (slopes, load support)
Geomembranes Impermeable sheet (HDPE, PVC) Containment (landfills, ponds)
5.1.2 Uses in Foundation Engineering
  • Reinforcement: Over soft soil, increase bearing capacity, reduce settlement (geogrids/geocells).

  • Separation: Prevent mixing of dissimilar soils (e.g., subgrade and ballast).

  • Filtration: Allow water flow but retain soil particles (non-woven geotextile).

  • Drainage: Transmit water (geocomposites,geonets).

5.2 Soil Stabilization

5.2.1 Need & Situations
  • Improve strength & stiffness, reduce compressibility & permeability, control shrink-swell.

  • Situations: Weak subgrade, expansive soils, road construction, embankments on soft ground.

5.2.2 Methods
  • Mechanical: Compaction (increase density, reduce voids). Proctor tests determine optimum moisture.

  • Chemical:

    • Lime: Best for high-plasticity clays. Reduces plasticity, increases strength via pozzolanic reactions.

    • Cement: For sands & gravels, low-plasticity silts. Binds particles.

    • Bitumen: For waterproofing & binding (road bases).

  • Electrical (Electro-osmosis):

    • Principle: Apply DC current between electrodes in saturated clay. Water moves from anode (+) to cathode (-).

    • Use: Dewatering & consolidation of saturated clays (e.g., for slope stability, foundation preloading). Can combine with chemical injection (electro-chemical).

5.3 Problematic Soils

5.3.1 Expansive Soils
  • Characteristics: High shrink-swell potential due to montmorillonite clay minerals. Indicators: Liquid limit > 50%, Plasticity index > 25%, Activity > 1.5.

  • Problems: Heave during wetting (swelling pressure up to 200+ kPa), cracks in dry season, differential movement causing structural damage.

  • Preventive Measures:

    1. Moisture Control: Maintain constant moisture (impermeable barriers, landscaping).

    2. Replacement: Remove & replace with non-expansive fill.

    3. Under-reamed Piles: Transfer load to stable strata below active zone.

    4. Chemical Stabilization: Lime/cement treatment.

    5. Saturated & Stiffened Soil: Pre-wet & compact to create stable crust.

5.3.2 Collapsible Soils
  • Characteristics: Loose, metastable structure (often loess, wind-blown or alluvial). Sudden collapse upon wetting or loading. Low moisture content, high void ratio.

  • Problems: Sudden settlement (can be several % of layer thickness) causing severe damage.

  • Preventive Measures:

    1. Pre-wetting: Saturate soil before construction to induce collapse early.

    2. Compaction: Dynamic compaction, compaction grouting.

    3. Replacement: Excavate and replace with engineered fill.

    4. Chemical Stabilization: Lime/cement to bind particles.

    5. Deep Foundations: Piles to bypass collapsible zone.


6.0 SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS & MISCELLANEOUS

6.1 Well Foundations (Caissons)

  • Components with Sketch:

    
    Top Plug (concrete)
    
    Well Cap (RCC)
    
    Well Steining (brick/masonry)
    
    Well Curb (bottom cutting edge)
    
    Diaphragm Wall (temporary partition)
    
    Bottom Plug (concrete)
    
    Cutting Edge (steel)
    
    
    • Well Curb: Bottom-most reinforced concrete part with cutting edge.

    • Well Steining: Tapered walls (1:10 to 1:12) to reduce skin friction during sinking.

    • Diaphragm Wall: Internal partition for large wells.

    • Bottom/Top Plug: Seal bottom after sinking, provide base for well cap.

  • Suitability: Deep water foundations (bridges, docks), scour zones, hard strata at depth.

  • Sinking Process: Excavate inside, self-weight + surcharge causes sinking. Trim bottom, grout outside if needed.

6.2 Stress Distribution in Soils

6.2.1 Boussinesq's Theory (1885)
  • Assumptions: Homogeneous, isotropic, elastic half-space, point load on surface, no shear strength (only elastic).

  • Vertical Stress under Point Load (P):

$$\Delta \sigma_z = \frac{3P}{2\pi z^2} \cdot \frac{1}{\left[1 + \left(\frac{r}{z}\right)^2\right]^{5/2}}$$

*   $z$ = depth, $r$ = radial distance.
  • Isobars: Lines of equal $$\displaystyle \Delta \sigma_z $$. 2:1 Distribution: Simplified method: stress spreads at 2V:1H from loaded area.

  • Influence Charts (e.g., Newmark's): For uniformly loaded areas.

6.2.2 Westergaard's Theory (1938)
  • Assumptions: Soil is incompressible in vertical direction (layered, with rigid horizontal layers), point load.

  • Key Difference: Accounts for stratification. Vertical stress does not spread laterally as much as Boussinesq. More conservative (higher stress) near loaded area.

  • Equation (for point load on surface):

$$\Delta \sigma_z = \frac{P}{\pi z^2} \cdot \frac{1}{(1 + 2\frac{r^2}{z^2})^2}$$

*   For $$\displaystyle r=0 $$, $$\displaystyle \Delta \sigma_z = \frac{P}{\pi z^2} $$ (vs. Boussinesq's $$\displaystyle \frac{0.318P}{z^2} $$).

6.3 Modes of Shear Failure in Soils

  • General Shear Failure: Dense sands / stiff clays. Continuous failure surface to surface. Sudden failure, well-defined peak, large settlements. q-settle curve: distinct peak.

  • Local Shear Failure: Medium-dense sands / medium-stiff clays. Failure surface develops only near footing. Progressive failure, no clear peak, moderate settlements.

  • Punching Shear Failure: Very loose sands / soft clays. Failure resembles punching through soil. No distinct failure surface. q-settle curve: no peak, gradual failure. Compression dominates under footing.

    [!TIP] Curve Interpretation: General → peak & sudden drop; Local → slight peak; Punching → no peak.

6.4 Factors Affecting Selection of Foundation Type

  • Soil Conditions: Depth to firm stratum, bearing capacity, settlement potential, water table.

  • Structural Loads: Magnitude, type (axial, moment), distribution.

  • Adjacent Structures: Need to limit vibration, settlement, excavation effects.

  • Cost & Constructability: Shallow vs. deep cost, equipment availability, time.

  • Durability & Maintenance: Corrosion, scour, access.

  • Environmental: Noise, vibration, disposal of spoils.


END OF UNIT 5 NOTES
Aligned with RGPV CE-802(B) past papers (2022-2025). Focus on problem-solving for bearing capacity, settlement, pile groups, earth pressure, and SPT corrections.

Go to where you left off?

Quick Add to Notes

Save questions, your own notes and screenshots into notes filed by unit. It takes a free account.

Create free account

Have an account? Log in