UNIT 1: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION & SOIL SAMPLING
I. Planning & Execution of Site Exploration
Objectives: To determine soil profile, groundwater, and engineering properties for safe, economical foundation design.
IS 1892 (Part 1) Criteria for Borehole Depth & Spacing:
-
Depth: Should penetrate to a significant depth where stress increase from foundation ≤ 10-20% of effective overburden. For preliminary studies, depth ≈ width of largest planned foundation.
-
Spacing: Governed by soil variability.
-
Homogeneous soils: 30-50 m.
-
Variable soils: 15-30 m.
-
Critical sites/structures: Closer spacing (5-15 m).
-
Boring Methods:
| Method | Principle | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auger Boring (Manual/Mechanical) | Helical auger cuts & brings soil to surface. | Fast in cohesionless soils, cheap. | Disturbs soft clays, cannot handle boulders/water. |
| Rotary Drilling | Rotating bit with circulating fluid (mud/water) brings cuttings. | Fastest, handles all soils & rock, good for deep holes, maintains hole stability with mud. | Expensive, requires water/mud management. |
| Percussion (Shell & Auger) | Dropping chisel/bit to crush rock, bailer removes cuttings. | Good for hard strata/rock. | Slow, severe sample disturbance. |
| Wash Boring | Water jet loosens soil, bailer removes slurry. | Simple, cheap. | High disturbance, not for sampling. |
Geophysical Methods (Indirect Exploration):
-
Seismic Refraction: Measures wave velocity to infer soil/rock layers & depth to bedrock.
-
Electrical Resistivity: Measures soil resistivity to map stratigraphy & groundwater.
-
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): High-resolution imaging of shallow layers (limited by conductivity).
[!TIP] Exam Focus: Rotary drilling is frequently asked for its advantages (speed, depth, stability). Remember IS 1892 criteria link depth to stress distribution (Boussinesq) and spacing to soil variability.
II. In-Situ Testing
Standard Penetration Test (SPT):
-
Procedure: Drive a split spoon sampler (50 mm ID) 450 mm into soil at borehole bottom using a 63.5 kg hammer falling 760 mm. Count blows for each 150 mm penetration. Last 300 mm blows = N-value.
-
Significance of N-value: Empirical index for:
-
Relative density of sands.
-
Consistency of clays.
-
Bearing capacity & settlement estimation.
-
Liquefaction potential assessment.
-
Corrections to Field N-value (N_field):
- Overburden Pressure Correction (N₁): For cohesionless soils.
$$N_1 = N_{field} \times \left( \frac{\bar{\sigma}_v'}{100 \text{ kPa}} \right)^{0.5} \quad \text{(for } \bar{\sigma}_v' \text{ in kPa)}$$
- Dilatancy Correction (N₂): For dense, saturated fine sands/silts (N₁ > 15). Corrects for negative pore pressure.
$$N_2 = 15 + 0.5(N_1 - 15) \quad \text{(if } N_1 > 15\text{)}$$
- Energy Correction (N₆₀): Corrects to 60% standard energy (E_B = 2.68 N-m). Most crucial for design.
$$N_{60} = N_{field} \times \frac{E_m}{E_B}$$
where $$\displaystyle E_m $$ = actual hammer energy ratio (often 50-90%).
Final Corrected N-value (N₆₀,corr): Apply corrections sequentially: N_field → N₁ → N₂ → N₆₀. Use N₆₀,corr for design correlations.
Cone Penetration Test (CPT/CPTu):
-
Procedure: Push a cone (10 cm² area) into soil at 20 mm/s, measuring cone resistance (q_c) and sleeve friction (f_s) continuously.
-
Output: Continuous soil profile, identifies layers, estimates strength/compressibility.
-
CPTu: Adds pore pressure (u) measurement for better soil typing and consolidation parameters.
-
SPT vs. SCPT:
| Feature | SPT | SCPT | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Sample | Disturbed (split spoon) | No sample (continuous profiling) | | Disruption | High (dynamic) | Low (static) | | Data | Discrete (every 1.5 m) | Continuous | | Cost | Low | High |
Vane Shear Test: For soft clays (< 25 kPa). Inserts a four-blade vane, measures peak & residual torque to calculate undrained shear strength ($$\displaystyle c_u $$).
Pressuremeter Test (PMT): Inflates a membrane in a borehole, measures pressure-deformation to derive in-situ modulus (E_M) and limit pressure (p_L) for bearing capacity.
III. Soil Sampling
Disturbed vs. Undisturbed Samples:
| Feature | Disturbed | Undisturbed |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Altered/ destroyed | Preserved |
| Strength | Lost | Retained |
| Use | Classification, water content, compaction tests | Strength (triaxial, oedometer), consolidation tests |
| Identification | Hand sample, chunks | Shelby tube (intact core), piston sampler |
Sampling Tools & Quality Parameters:
- Open Drive Sampler (Shelby Tube): Thin-walled, pushed/driven. Inside Clearance (C_i) & Outside Clearance (C_o) critical.
$$C_i = \frac{D_i - D_c}{D_c} \times 100\% \quad ; \quad C_o = \frac{D_c - D_o}{D_o} \times 100\%$$
* **C_i (1-3%):** Reduces friction, aids sample entry.
* **C_o (0-2%):** Reduces soil compression on sample.
- Area Ratio (A_r): Ratio of cutting edge area to tube area.
$$A_r = \frac{(D_o^2 - D_i^2)}{D_i^2} \times 100\%$$
* **A_r < 10%** for undisturbed clays. Lower = less disturbance.
- Length-Diameter Ratio (L/D): Should be > 2 for good quality.
CNS Layer (Cavity, No Strain): The idealized sampling disturbance zone. A thin layer around the sample where soil is strained but not sheared. Minimizing CNS layer is key for undisturbed sampling.
Bore-log Report Components:
-
Project details, borehole location & elevation.
-
Soil description (color, consistency, stratification).
-
Depth of water table & strata changes.
-
SPT N-values (with corrections noted).
-
Sample type & recovery.
-
Laboratory test results (if any).
-
Graphical log (soil symbols, N-value plot).
[!TIP] Common Pitfall: Confusing Area Ratio (A_r) formula. Remember it's based on annular area of cutting edge vs. inner area of tube. For Shelby tube, $$\displaystyle D_i $$ is inner diameter.
UNIT 1: SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS - BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT
I. Types & Selection
Types: Isolated, Combined, Strip, Raft/Mat, Floating. Selection Factors:
-
Soil: Strength, compressibility, depth to bedrock.
-
Load: Magnitude, type (axial, moment), distribution.
-
Structure: Sensitivity to settlement, rigidity.
-
Cost: Excavation vs. material.
-
Basic Criteria: Adequate bearing capacity & acceptable total & differential settlement.
II. Bearing Capacity
Key Definitions:
-
Gross Pressure (q): Total load / area.
-
Net Pressure (q_net): $$\displaystyle q_{net} = q - \gamma D_f $$ (D_f = depth).
-
Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u): Max gross pressure before shear failure.
-
Net Ultimate (q_nu): $$\displaystyle q_{nu} = q_u - \gamma D_f $$.
-
Net Safe (q_ns): $$\displaystyle q_{ns} = \frac{q_{nu}}{FOS} $$.
-
Allowable Bearing Pressure (q_all): Usually = q_ns or settlement-controlled value.
Modes of Shear Failure (Sketch Essential):
-
General Shear: Deep foundations, dense soils. Continuous failure surface to surface, large settlements, distinct peak.
-
Local Shear: Medium dense/medium stiff soils. Failure surfaces limited, moderate settlements.
-
Punching Shear: Very loose soils/very deep foundations. Soil punches under footing, minimal surface heave, large settlements.
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory (1943):
-
Assumptions: Strip footing, rough base, soil above base ignored (γD_f term added later), Rankine's active earth pressure at sides, Mohr-Coulomb failure.
-
Equation (for strip footing):
$$q_u = c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma$$
* $$\displaystyle N_c, N_q, N_\gamma $$: Bearing capacity factors (function of φ).
* For **square footing:** $$\displaystyle q_u = 1.3c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.4 \gamma B N_\gamma $$.
* For **circular footing:** $$\displaystyle q_u = 1.3c N_c + \gamma D_f N_q + 0.3 \gamma B N_\gamma $$.
* For **rectangular footing:** Use shape factors (s_c, s_q, s_γ).
IS Code Method (BIS: IS 6403):
- Generalized Equation:
$$\boxed{q_{nu} = c N_c s_c d_c i_c + \gamma D_f N_q s_q d_q i_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma s_\gamma d_\gamma i_\gamma}$$
* **Shape Factors (s):** Account for footing shape (e.g., $$\displaystyle s_c = 1 + 0.2 \frac{B}{L} $$ for rectangular).
* **Depth Factors (d):** For deep foundations ($$\displaystyle D_f/B > 1 $$).
* **Inclination Factors (i):** For inclined loads.
* **Note:** For most shallow foundations, $$\displaystyle d_c = d_q = d_\gamma = 1 $$, $$\displaystyle i_c = i_q = i_\gamma = 1 $$ if load vertical.
Water Table Correction:
-
If water table at/above foundation base, use submerged unit weight (γ') for the γB N_γ term.
-
For water table within depth D_f, use effective overburden at base for γD_f N_q term.
-
General Rule: Use effective stresses in the bearing capacity equation.
Numerical Approach:
-
Determine soil parameters (c, φ, γ).
-
Find N_c, N_q, N_γ from tables (Terzaghi or IS).
-
Apply shape, depth, load inclination factors.
-
Apply water table correction (use γ' where appropriate).
-
Compute q_nu, then q_ns with FOS (typically 2.5-3.0).
III. Settlement of Foundations
Components:
-
Immediate (Elastic) Settlement (S_i): Occurs during/just after construction in cohesive soils (undrained) & cohesionless soils (due to shear distortion).
-
Primary Consolidation Settlement (S_c): Due to expulsion of pore water from cohesive soils under sustained load. Time-dependent.
-
Secondary Compression (S_s): Post-primary consolidation due to soil structure rearrangement.
Immediate Settlement (S_i) for Cohesive Soils (Elastic Half-Space):
$$\boxed{S_i = \frac{q B (1 - \mu^2)}{E_s} I_f}$$
-
q = net pressure.
-
B = footing width.
-
μ = Poisson's ratio.
-
E_s = Secant modulus from undrained triaxial test (E_s ≈ 2-3 E_u for normally consolidated clays).
-
I_f = Influence factor (from charts like 2:1 distribution or 3D elastic charts). For flexible square footing on clay, I_f ≈ 1.0 - 1.2.
Consolidation Settlement (S_c) - One Dimensional:
$$S_c = \frac{C_c}{1 + e_0} H \log_{10} \left( \frac{\bar{\sigma}_0' + \Delta \bar{\sigma}'}{\bar{\sigma}_0'} \right)$$
-
C_c = compression index.
-
e_0 = initial void ratio.
-
H = thickness of compressible layer.
-
$$\displaystyle \bar{\sigma}_0' $$ = initial effective stress.
-
$\Delta \bar{\sigma}'$ = increase in effective stress (from 2:1 or other distribution).
Plate Load Test:
-
Procedure: Load a rigid plate (usually 0.3 m sq.) at ground level, measure settlement.
-
Load-Settlement Curve: Ultimate load (q_u,plate) from curve (usually at settlement = 20% plate width).
-
Extrapolation to Field Footing:
- For Clay: Settlement is proportional to width (B).
$$S_{field} = S_{plate} \times \frac{B_{field}}{B_{plate}}$$
* **For Sand:** Bearing capacity is proportional to width.
$$q_{u,field} = q_{u,plate} \times \frac{B_{field}}{B_{plate}}$$
* **Note:** Assumes similar stress distribution & soil homogeneity.
[!TIP] Critical Distinction: In clay, settlement ∝ B (same pressure). In sand, bearing capacity ∝ B (same settlement). This is a classic exam question.
UNIT 1: DEEP FOUNDATIONS - PILES
I. Introduction & Classification
Necessity: When shallow foundations inadequate (low bearing capacity, large settlement, scour, etc.). Classification:
-
By Material: Timber, Concrete (precast/cast-in-situ), Steel, Composite.
-
By Function/Action:
-
End-bearing: Transfers load to hard stratum.
-
Friction: Load by skin friction along shaft.
-
Combined: Both end-bearing & friction.
-
Tension/Anchor: Resists uplift.
-
Sheet: Retains soil (cofferdams, bulkheads).
-
-
By Construction:
-
Driven: Precast, displacement (crowding soil).
-
Bored: Cast-in-situ, non-displacement (less disturbance).
-
Screwed/Under-reamed: Special types.
-
II. Pile Load Capacity
Static Load Carrying Capacity (Q_u):
$$Q_u = Q_b + Q_s$$
-
End Bearing (Q_b): $$\displaystyle Q_b = q_b \times A_p $$
-
Clay: $$\displaystyle q_b = N_c c $$ (N_c ≈ 9 for deep piles).
-
Sand: $$\displaystyle q_b = \gamma D_p N_q $$ (N_q from bearing capacity factors).
-
-
Shaft Friction (Q_s): $$\displaystyle Q_s = f_s \times A_s $$
-
α-method (Clays): $$\displaystyle f_s = \alpha \cdot c_u $$ (α = adhesion factor, 0.4-1.0, decreases with depth/softness).
-
β-method (Sands): $$\displaystyle f_s = \beta \cdot \bar{\sigma}_v' $$ (β = friction factor, ≈ K tanδ, K ≈ 1-2, δ ≈ 0.75φ).
-
Dynamic Formulae (Impact Driving):
- Engineering News Formula (ENF):
$$Q_{safe} = \frac{W h}{S + C} \times \frac{W + n W'}{W + W'}$$
* W = hammer weight, h = fall, S = set (penetration/blow), C = constant (2.5 cm), n = efficiency (0.6-0.8), W' = pile weight.
* **Limitations:** Ignores elastic compression, restitution.
- Hiley's Formula (Improved ENF):
$$\boxed{Q_{safe} = \frac{\eta W h}{S + \frac{C}{2}} \times \frac{W + n W'}{W + W'}}$$
* η = **coefficient of restitution** (0.25-0.5 for concrete-steel).
* **Includes** average elastic compression (C/2).
* **Most commonly used** in practice.
Pile Capacity from SPT/CPT:
-
SPT: $$\displaystyle Q_b = N \cdot A_p \cdot q_b $$ (q_b from correlations), $$\displaystyle Q_s = \sum (f_s \cdot \Delta A_s) $$ where $$\displaystyle f_s $$ from N-value correlations.
-
CPT: Directly uses $$\displaystyle q_c $$ and $$\displaystyle f_s $$ with empirical correlations (e.g., $$\displaystyle f_s = \alpha \cdot q_c $$ for clays).
III. Pile Groups & Negative Skin Friction
Pile Group Efficiency (η_g):
$$\eta_g = \frac{Q_{ug}}{n \cdot Q_{up}}$$
-
η_g < 1 for most groups due to group effect (overlap of stress bulbs).
-
Block Failure: Occurs in soft clays at close spacing (< 3D). Entire soil block fails.
$$Q_{ug(block)} = c \cdot (B_g \cdot L_g) \cdot N_c + \gamma D_f (B_g L_g) N_q$$
* B_g, L_g = group dimensions.
- Individual Failure: Piles fail individually, group capacity < nQ_up.
Geometric Properties for Spacing:
-
Center-to-center spacing (s): Minimum 2-3 times pile diameter (D) for clays, 3-4D for sands to minimize group effect.
-
Group Shape: Square, rectangular, triangular. Efficiency depends on arrangement.
Negative Skin Friction (NSF):
-
Cause: Downward movement of soil relative to pile (e.g., soft clay consolidation, fill placement, water table drop).
-
Effect: Increases load on pile (reduces capacity), causes additional settlement.
-
Calculation for Single Pile in Cohesive Soil:
$$\boxed{Q_{nsf} = \bar{f}_{nsf} \times A_s = \left( \gamma \cdot \Delta z \cdot K \cdot \tan \delta \right) \times (\pi D L_{nsf})}$$
* $$\displaystyle \bar{f}_{nsf} $$ = average NSF stress.
* Δz = thickness of compressible layer.
* K = lateral earth pressure coefficient (≈ 1.0 for NC clays).
* δ = interface friction angle (≈ φ for rough concrete).
* L_nsf = length through compressible layer.
- Design: Net allowable load = Q_u - Q_nsf.
IV. Special Pile Types
Under-reamed Piles:
-
Concept: Single/multiple bulbs (under-reams) on shaft in expansive soils.
-
Suitability: Expansive soils (high shrink-swell), loess, collapsible soils. Bulbs provide tension anchorage to resist uplift.
-
Ultimate Tensile Capacity:
$$Q_{tu} = Q_{s(adhesion)} + Q_{b(under-ream)}$$
* $$\displaystyle Q_{s(adhesion)} = \alpha \cdot c_u \cdot A_s $$ (up to bulbs).
* $$\displaystyle Q_{b(under-ream)} = A_b \cdot q_b $$ (q_b = 9c_u for clay, bearing on bulb base).
* **Neglect suction** (as per problem statement).
Well Foundations (Caissons):
-
Components (Neat Sketch Required):
-
Well curb: Bottom cutting edge (steel/iron).
-
Well steining: Masonry/concrete above curb (provides weight for sinking).
-
Cutting edge: Beveled edge for penetration.
-
Lining/Wall: Brick/stone/concrete rings.
-
Bottom plug: Concrete plug at bottom (after sinking).
-
Top plug: Concrete plug at top (after dewatering).
-
Well cap: RCC beam to distribute load from pier.
-
-
Types: Open (dry), Pneumatic (compressed air), Box (prefabricated).
-
Sinking Methods: By gravity, with kentledge, with water jetting (in sand), with pneumatic pressure.
V. Numerical Problems (Comprehensive)
-
Single Pile Capacity: Always check Q_b and Q_s separately. For clay, $$\displaystyle Q_b = 9c_u A_p $$ (deep pile). For sand, $$\displaystyle Q_b = \gamma D_p N_q A_p $$.
-
Pile Group Capacity (Neglecting End Bearing):
$$Q_{ug} = \alpha \cdot c_u \cdot (A_s)_{group}$$
where $$\displaystyle (A_s)_{group} $$ = total surface area of all piles in group. Apply group efficiency if spacing < 3D.
-
Layered Soils: Calculate Q_b from bearing stratum. Calculate Q_s by summing contributions from each layer: $$\displaystyle Q_s = \sum (\alpha_i c_{ui} \cdot \Delta A_s) $$.
-
Dynamic Formula (Hiley's): Must compute elastic compression (C) of pile + cap:
$$C = \frac{Q_u L}{A E} \quad \text{(in cm)}$$
where Q_u = ultimate load, L = length, A = area, E = modulus.
[!TIP] Exam Trap: In pile group problems, if spacing is given as 90 cm for 300 mm dia piles, s/D = 3.0. For soft clay, this is critical spacing—may need to consider block failure or reduced efficiency. Always check: if s < 3D, group efficiency < 1.
UNIT 1: EARTH PRESSURE & RETAINING STRUCTURES
I. Types of Lateral Earth Pressure
-
At-rest (K₀): Wall does not move (e.g., basement walls before backfill). $$\displaystyle K₀ = 1 - \sin \phi' $$ (for NC soils).
-
Active (Kₐ): Wall moves away from soil (unloading). Minimum pressure.
-
Passive (Kₚ): Wall moves into soil (loading). Maximum pressure.
-
Relationship: $$\displaystyle K_a K_p = 1 $$ (for $$\displaystyle \phi' > 0 $$).
II. Classical Theories
Rankine's Theory (1875):
-
Assumptions: Wall smooth (δ=0), horizontal backfill, no wall friction, infinite wall.
-
For Cohesionless Soil (φ'):
$$K_a = \tan^2 \left(45^\circ - \frac{\phi'}{2}\right) \quad ; \quad K_p = \tan^2 \left(45^\circ + \frac{\phi'}{2}\right)$$
-
For Cohesive Soil (c', φ'):
-
Active: $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K_a \gamma z - 2c \sqrt{K_a} $$ (tension crack if $$\displaystyle \sigma_h < 0 $$).
-
Passive: $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K_p \gamma z + 2c \sqrt{K_p} $$.
-
-
Pressure Diagram: Triangular for c-φ soil with c'=0. For c'>0, active diagram has negative zone near top.
Coulomb's Theory (1776):
-
Assumptions: Inclined failure plane, wall friction (δ) considered, inclined backfill (β) possible.
-
Derivation: Wedge analysis, minimize active thrust by varying failure plane angle.
-
Active Earth Pressure Coefficient:
$$K_a = \frac{\cos^2(\phi' - \delta)}{\cos^2 \delta \cos(\delta + \beta) \left[1 + \sqrt{\frac{\sin(\phi' + \delta) \sin(\phi' - \beta)}{\cos(\delta + \beta)}} \right]^2}$$
* For δ=0, β=0 → reduces to Rankine's K_a.
-
Merits over Rankine:
-
Considers wall friction (δ) → more realistic.
-
Allows inclined backfill (β).
-
Applicable for both cohesionless & cohesive soils.
-
Passive pressure from Coulomb is more reliable (Rankine overestimates).
-
Comparison:
| Feature | Rankine | Coulomb |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Friction | Neglected (δ=0) | Considered (δ>0) |
| Backfill | Horizontal only | Inclined allowed |
| Failure Plane | Vertical wall → 45+φ/2 | Inclined, variable |
| K_a Value | Higher (for δ>0) | Lower, more realistic |
| K_p Value | Lower (overly conservative) | Higher, more realistic |
III. Graphical Methods
-
Culmann's Graphical Method: For active pressure with irregular, inclined backfill and surcharge. Construct failure wedges from wall, draw pressure lines.
-
Rebhann's Graphical Method: For passive pressure.
IV. Earth Pressure on Retaining Walls
Numerical Calculation Steps:
-
Draw pressure diagram for each layer (consider water table, surcharge).
-
For cohesionless soil: $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K \gamma z $$ (above WT: γ_dry; below: γ_sat).
-
For cohesive soil (active): $$\displaystyle \sigma_h = K \gamma z - 2c \sqrt{K} $$. Check for tension crack depth $$\displaystyle z_c = \frac{2c}{\gamma \sqrt{K}} $$.
-
With water table/seepage: Use submerged unit weight (γ') below WT. Add hydrostatic pressure (u = γ_w z) on total stress diagram.
-
Resultant Thrust (P): Area of pressure diagram. Point of application = centroid.
-
Triangular: at h/3 from base.
-
Trapezoidal: divide into triangle+rectangle.
-
Example (Stratified Backfill): Calculate K for each layer (use φ of that layer). Sum pressures at interfaces. Plot diagram, find total P and its point of action.
V. Retaining Wall Design & Stability
Modes of Failure:
-
Overturning: Wall rotates about toe. Check FOS = Resisting Moment / Overturning Moment ≥ 1.5.
-
Sliding: Wall slides along base. Check FOS = (μ W + P_p) / P_a ≥ 1.5 (μ = friction coeff., P_p = passive force at toe).
-
Bearing Capacity Failure: Excessive pressure on soil. Check $$\displaystyle q_{max} \leq q_{all} $$.
-
Excessive Settlement/Differential Settlement.
Sheet Piles vs. Retaining Walls:
| Feature | Sheet Piles | Retaining Walls |
|---|---|---|
| Function | Retention (cofferdams, bulkheads) | Support (free-standing) |
| Design | Flexible (bending, deflection) | Rigid (gravity/cantilever) |
| Material | Steel, timber, vinyl | Masonry, concrete, RCC |
| Depth | Can be very deep | Usually shallow to moderate |
| Uses | Temporary/permanent walls, excavation support | Bridge abutments, garden walls, basement |
Uses of Sheet Piles:
-
Cofferdams for foundations in water.
-
Retaining walls for excavations.
-
Bulkheads for waterfronts.
-
Slope stabilization.
-
Noise barriers.
[!TIP] Earth Pressure Calculation: Always draw the pressure diagram. For cohesive soil with water table, remember: active pressure = (K γ' z) - 2c√K + (γ_w z) (hydrostatic on top of effective stress diagram). Tension crack depth is critical for cohesive backfills.
UNIT 1: SPECIAL TOPICS & SOIL IMPROVEMENT
I. Problematic Soils
Expansive Soils (Black Cotton Soils):
-
Characteristics:
-
High montmorillonite clay content.
-
High shrinkage/swelling potential (low liquid limit? No, high LL > 50%).
-
Low strength when wet, hard when dry.
-
High compressibility, low permeability.
-
Cracks on drying.
-
-
Problems:
-
Heave (swelling) → lifts foundation.
-
Shrinkage → settlement & cracks in structure.
-
Volume change → differential movement.
-
-
Preventive Measures:
-
Moisture Control: Maintain constant water content (impermeable blanket, landscaping).
-
Replacement: Remove & replace with non-expansive fill.
-
Stabilization: Lime/cement treatment.
-
Under-reamed Piles: Best solution for heavy structures. Bulbs anchor in non-swelling zone.
-
Raft Foundations: Spread load, reduce pressure.
-
Collapsible Soils:
-
Characteristics:
-
Loose, porous, cemented (e.g., loess, wind-blown silt).
-
Dry has moderate strength.
-
Sudden collapse upon wetting (loss of cementation).
-
Low density, high void ratio.
-
-
Problems: Sudden, large settlement upon wetting (rainfall, leakage).
-
Preventive Measures:
-
Pre-wetting: Saturate soil before construction to induce collapse.
-
Compaction: Dynamic compaction, heavy tamping.
-
Piles: Transfer load through collapsible zone.
-
Chemical Stabilization: Lime/cement to break cementation bonds before wetting.
-
II. Soil Stabilization & Improvement
Need: To improve strength, reduce compressibility/permeability, control swell. Situations: Weak subgrade, expansive soils, fills, slope stabilization.
Methods:
-
Mechanical: Compaction (increases density, strength).
-
Chemical: Lime (for clay, reduces plasticity, pozzolanic), Cement (for sand/clay, binds particles), Bitumen (for waterproofing, base course).
-
Electrical: Electro-osmosis.
-
Mechanism: Apply DC electric field → water migrates from anode to cathode in clay (electro-osmotic flow).
-
Application: Consolidate very soft, saturated clays (e.g., for slope stabilization, preloading). Often combined with chemical injection (electro-chemical).
-
III. Geosynthetics
Types & Functions:
| Type | Material | Primary Functions |
|---|---|---|
| Geotextiles | Woven/Non-woven fabrics | Separation, Filtration, Reinforcement, Drainage |
| Geogrids | Polymer grids (uniaxial/biaxial) | Reinforcement (high tensile strength) |
| Geomembranes | HDPE, LDPE sheets | Containment (liners for landfills, ponds) |
| Geocomposites | Combinations (e.g., geotextile + geonet) | Drainage (geocomposite drains) |
| Geocells | 3D honeycombs | Reinforcement, Confinement (slope protection, load support) |
Uses in Foundation Engineering:
-
Separation: Prevent mixing of fine subgrade with coarse ballast/aggregate (railways, roads).
-
Reinforcement: Increase bearing capacity, reduce settlement in weak soils (geogrids/geotextiles in embankments, rafts).
-
Filtration: Allow water flow but retain soil particles (drainage layers, behind retaining walls).
-
Containment: Liners for ponds, landfills (geomembranes).
-
Drainage: Geocomposite drains for vertical/horizontal drainage (prefabricated).
IV. Compaction
Objectives: Increase density → increase strength, decrease compressibility/permeability, control swelling.
Field Equipment:
-
Sheepsfoot: Best for cohesive soils (kneading action).
-
Smooth-wheel (Tamping): Granular soils.
-
Pneumatic-tired: Flexible mat, good for both.
-
Vibratory: Best for clean sands/gravels.
Proctor Tests:
| Feature | Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) | Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) |
|---|---|---|
| Hammer Weight | 2.5 kg (5.5 lb) | 4.5 kg (10 lb) |
| Drop Height | 305 mm (12 in) | 457 mm (18 in) |
| No. of Layers | 3 | 5 |
| Blows per Layer | 25 | 25 |
| Compaction Energy | ~600 kN-m/m³ | ~2700 kN-m/m³ |
| OMC | Higher | Lower |
| MDD | Lower | Higher |
[!TIP] Key Difference: Modified Proctor has higher energy → higher MDD, lower OMC. Used for highway/airfield fills. Standard Proctor for general earthworks.
Final Note: This compilation strictly follows the RGPV CE-802(B) blueprint, prioritizing repeated exam topics (SPT corrections, IS bearing capacity, pile group/NSF, earth pressure theories, problematic soils). All definitions, formulas, and procedures are boxed for quick revision. Practice numerical problems from past papers using the step-by-step methods outlined.