Skip to content
AD-803 (C) · Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship/Quick Revision Short Notes

Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship (AD-803 (C)) - Unit 5 Short Notes

How unit 5 is examined

This unit covers how a firm measures innovation (financial and non-financial metrics and how to combine and choose them), what blocks and kills innovation, how finished projects are audited, and how an innovation workshop is run. No topic has been asked recently, so each is taught in full but briefly, ready for the exam if it appears this year.

Measurement and evaluation of the benefits of innovation for business

<span style="display:inline-block;padding:.16em .6em;border:1.5px solid currentColor;border-radius:999px;font-size:.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.06em;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:.75">Not asked since 2022</span>

Definition. <mark>Innovation measurement is the use of financial and non-financial metrics, chosen and combined to fit the firm's strategy, to judge whether an innovation creates value for the business.</mark>

Key points.

  1. Financial metrics show returns in money; they include NPV, IRR, ROI, payback period, profit margin and the share of revenue coming from new products.
  2. Non-financial metrics show capability and future potential; they include customer satisfaction, market share, patents filed, time to market, number of ideas generated and employee engagement.
  3. Financial metrics are lagging and suit mature, incremental projects, while non-financial metrics are leading and suit early-stage or radical projects where no revenue exists yet.
  4. Combination means using both kinds together, for example in a balanced scorecard with financial, customer, internal-process and learning views, so that no single number misleads.
  5. Choice of metric depends on the project stage, the type of innovation (product, process, organizational, marketing), the risk level and the firm's strategy.
  6. Good metrics are few, measurable, linked to strategy, and reviewed at fixed intervals.

Formula. $ROI = \dfrac{\text{Net benefit}}{\text{Cost of innovation}} \times 100$; $NPV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \dfrac{C_t}{(1+r)^t} - C_0$; $\text{Payback} = \dfrac{\text{Initial investment}}{\text{Annual cash inflow}}$.

Example. A process innovation costs Rs 10 lakh and saves Rs 4 lakh a year, so payback is $10/4 = 2.5$ years; the firm also tracks defect rate and staff satisfaction as non-financial checks.

Answer frame. Open with the definition; list financial metrics, then non-financial metrics in two groups; state the formulas; explain combination and choice; close with the balanced-scorecard idea.

Barriers to innovation in business

<span style="display:inline-block;padding:.16em .6em;border:1.5px solid currentColor;border-radius:999px;font-size:.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.06em;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:.75">Not asked since 2022</span>

Definition. <mark>Barriers to innovation are internal or external factors that prevent, slow or weaken the generation and adoption of new ideas in a firm.</mark>

Key points.

  1. Resistance to change arises because employees fear losing status, jobs or comfort, so new ideas are ignored or blocked.
  2. Rigid hierarchy and bureaucracy slow decisions, so ideas die while waiting for approval.
  3. Fear of failure and a culture that punishes mistakes stop people from taking risks.
  4. Lack of funds, time and skilled people means good ideas cannot be developed into products.
  5. A short-term focus on quarterly profit pushes out long-term research and experiments.
  6. Weak communication and silos between departments keep knowledge and customer insight from being shared.
  7. External barriers include regulation, weak infrastructure, uncertain demand, strong competitors and limited access to finance or technology.

Removing them. Top-management support, a tolerant culture, reward for ideas, cross-functional teams and a protected innovation budget.

Answer frame. Open with the definition; split into internal and external barriers; develop points 1 to 7 in order; close with how they are overcome.

Innovation failure and its causes

<span style="display:inline-block;padding:.16em .6em;border:1.5px solid currentColor;border-radius:999px;font-size:.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.06em;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:.75">Not asked since 2022</span>

Definition. <mark>Innovation failure is the failure of a new product, process or idea to meet its technical, market or financial goals, so that the investment is not recovered.</mark>

Key points.

  1. Poor market research leads to a product nobody needs, which is the most common cause of failure.
  2. Weak project management causes delays, cost overruns and a late launch.
  3. Technical problems and poor quality make the product unreliable or too costly to make.
  4. Lack of top-management support and resources starves the project before it matures.
  5. Poor timing, wrong pricing or weak marketing reduces customer acceptance.
  6. Strong competitor response and imitation erode the advantage quickly.
  7. Failure can still be useful when the firm learns from it and records the lessons.

Example. A firm launches a gadget without testing customer need; sales stay low and the project is closed, so the cause is inadequate market research.

Answer frame. Open with the definition; list causes from market to technical to management; add the learning point; close by linking to stage-gate screening and post-audit.

Post-audits of innovative projects

<span style="display:inline-block;padding:.16em .6em;border:1.5px solid currentColor;border-radius:999px;font-size:.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.06em;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:.75">Not asked since 2022</span>

Definition. <mark>A post-audit is a formal review carried out after a project is completed or launched that compares actual results with the plan and records lessons for future projects.</mark>

Key points.

  1. It compares actual cost, time, quality and returns with the original business case and finds the variances.
  2. It identifies the reasons for success or failure, such as wrong assumptions, technical issues or market change.
  3. Lessons learned are documented and fed back into stage-gate criteria, forecasting and future project planning.
  4. It should be done by people independent of the project team, in a blame-free way, so that the learning is honest.
  5. It is timed when results are visible, often 6 to 12 months after launch, and repeated for long projects.
  6. It also checks whether benefits promised were delivered and whether the project should be continued, improved or closed.

Steps.

Step 1: Define audit scope and criteria from the original plan.
Step 2: Collect actual data on cost, time, quality and returns.
Step 3: Compare actual with planned and find variances.
Step 4: Analyse causes of the variances.
Step 5: Report findings and recommend actions.
Step 6: Store lessons learned for future projects.

Answer frame. Open with the definition; give the purpose; list the six steps; close with the lessons-learned feedback.

Organization and facilitation of an innovation workshop

<span style="display:inline-block;padding:.16em .6em;border:1.5px solid currentColor;border-radius:999px;font-size:.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:.06em;text-transform:uppercase;opacity:.75">Not asked since 2022</span>

Definition. <mark>An innovation workshop is a structured, facilitated group session that brings the right people together to generate, select and plan ideas for a defined challenge.</mark>

Key points.

  1. Organization starts with a clear objective and challenge statement so the group knows what problem it solves.
  2. The right mix of participants from different functions, levels and sometimes customers gives diverse views.
  3. The venue, time, materials and agenda are planned, and pre-reading is sent in advance.
  4. The facilitator is neutral, keeps time, sets ground rules such as no criticism during idea generation, and makes sure everyone speaks.
  5. Creative techniques such as brainstorming, mind mapping and Six Thinking Hats are used to generate many ideas.
  6. Ideas are clustered, evaluated against agreed criteria and voted on to select the best few.
  7. The session ends with owners, deadlines and next steps, and a follow-up report and action tracking make sure the output is implemented.

Answer frame. Open with the definition; give organization steps (before), facilitation (during), then follow-up (after); close by stating that the workshop turns ideas into an action plan.

Last-minute revision

  • Innovation metrics are financial (NPV, IRR, ROI, payback) plus non-financial (satisfaction, patents, time to market).
  • $ROI = \text{Net benefit}/\text{Cost} \times 100$; payback is investment divided by annual inflow.
  • Financial metrics lag; non-financial metrics lead; combine them, for example in a balanced scorecard.
  • Choose metrics by project stage, type of innovation, risk and strategy.
  • Barriers are internal (resistance, hierarchy, fear of failure, short-term focus) or external (regulation, market).
  • The top cause of failure is poor market research, followed by weak project management.
  • A post-audit compares actual with plan and records lessons learned.
  • A post-audit should be independent and blame-free, and usually held 6 to 12 months after launch.
  • Workshop: objective, participants, agenda, facilitator, techniques, evaluation, follow-up.

Memory hooks

  • Metrics: "Money and Mind", meaning financial plus non-financial.
  • Barriers: "People, Money, Rules", meaning resistance, funds and regulation.
  • Failure: "No market, no launch", so market research comes first.
  • Post-audit: "Plan versus Actual, then Learn".
  • Workshop: "Goal, Guests, Guide, Generate, Grade, Go".

Coverage checklist

  • Measurement and evaluation of the benefits of innovation for business (financial and nonfinancial metrics, their combination and choice): definition, financial and non-financial metrics, formulas, combination, choice.
  • Barriers to innovation in business: internal and external barriers, removal.
  • innovation failure and its causes: causes, example.
  • post-audits of innovative projects: purpose, key points, six steps.
  • Organization and facilitation of an innovation workshop: organization, facilitator role, evaluation, follow-up.
Go to where you left off?

Quick Add to Notes

Save questions, your own notes and screenshots into notes filed by unit. It takes a free account.

Create free account

Have an account? Log in